Account Information

  • My Account

    Manage all your subscriptions, update your address, email preferences and change your password.

  • Help Center

    Get answers to common service questions, ask the analyst or contact our subscriber service.

  • My Stock Talk Profile

    Update your stock talk name and/or picture.



Close

Which MLP Index is Best?

By Jim Fink on March 21, 2012

Print Friendly

Our philosophy is that it’s better to hold individual MLPs than to buy them through a mutual fund or an ETF. When you buy a fund or ETF, you’re basically buying the bad and ugly of a sector, as well as the good. That’s because ETFs are typically based on indexes, which by definition have to include the players even if they’re badly run.

– Roger Conrad, MLP Profits

I read last week that on March 13th only the second master limited partnership (MLP) exchange-traded fund (ETF) hit the market! This time Exchange Traded Concepts launched an MLP ETF called the Yorkville High Income MLP Index ETF (NYSE: YMLP). Although its portfolio of 22 MLPs and three royalty trusts is similar in size to the only other MLP ETF — the Alerian MLP ETF (NYSE: AMLP) — the similarity stops there. Yorkville tracks the Solactive High Income MLP Index (pp. 22-23), which is:

a rules-based index comprised of MLPs and royalty trusts that meet certain criteria relating to current yield, coverage ratio and distribution growth as determined by Structured Solutions. Market capitalization and liquidity screens will be applied in addition to the fundamental screens for current yield, coverage ratio and distribution growth to ensure sufficient market size and liquidity of the Index components.

The Solactive MLP index strikes me as a mysterious “black box,” so I’m not a fan. In contrast, the Alerian MLP ETF tracks the more-transparent Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index (^AMZIX) which is capitalization-weighted, excludes royalty trusts, is limited to pipeline companies, and includes the largest MLPs (including low-yielding ones). Unlike MLPs, royalty trusts don’t own any productive assets but simply own contractual rights to an energy or mining resource that eventually will become depleted (and worthless).

Bottom line: the Yorkville MLP ETF has a cash distribution yield of 8.5% whereas the Alerian MLP ETF has a yield of only 5.9%. If you want the safety and stability of the largest MLPs like Enterprise Products Partners (NYSE: EPD) and Kinder Morgan Energy (NYSE: KMP) (NYSE: KMR), don’t buy Yorkville because it doesn’t own them.

MLPs’ Outperformance Explains Their Popularity

The existence of eight MLP ETFs and ETNs shouldn’t come as a big surprise. Energy MLPs have outperformed the S&P 500 by a whopping 26 percentage points since the beginning of 2010:

Source: Bloomberg

Investors chase past performance and want more of the same. Wall Street makes its living by the old adage: “when the ducks are quacking, feed them,” so it will churn out as many of these MLP funds as the public will bear.

Different MLP Indices Provide Different MLP Exposure

With so many MLP products to choose from, it can be confusing how they differ. The key is to understand the index each MLP fund tracks and the methodology each index uses to select MLP securities.  If you want exposure only to conservative “pipeline” companies in the midstream sector, buy one of the funds that tracks either the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index or the Cushing 30 MLP Index. The Cushing 30 index gives you more “juice” because it is equal weighted, with higher-beta small-cap stocks having the same weight as the dodgier large-cap names. Furthermore, the Cushing index provides exposure to the “general partnership” units, which are more leveraged, whereas the Alerian infrastructure index is composed only of the more conservative “limited partnership” units.

In contrast, if you think energy prices are going higher and want exposure to this trend, you should stick with funds tracking the Alerian MLP Index, Tortoise MLP Index, and Wells Fargo MLP Index. All of these indices hold MLPs engaged in “upstream” exploration and production of oil and natural gas. Of these three indices, only the Tortoise MLP Index caps each individual MLP at a maximum holding percentage of 10%, which provides some guarantee of diversification.

Pros and Cons of MLP ETFs vs. MLP ETNs

Keep in mind that the cash distributions of MLP ETNs are treated as ordinary income and consequently the cash distributions of MLP ETNs do not offer investors the tax-advantaged “return of capital” benefits of individual MLPs. Equally if not more unpleasant, MLP ETFs are not permitted to be classified as a “Registered Investment Company” under the 1940 Act because such companies are defined as having investment portfolios that consist of no more than 25% MLP securities. Consequently, MLP ETFs are required to pay corporate tax as “C” corporations and must deduct from their net asset values (NAVs) a “deferred tax liability” equal to the 35% corporate tax rate times:

(1) the tax-deferred “return of capital” portion of cash distributions; plus

(2) the capital appreciation of the ETF itself

The result is that MLP ETFs severely underperform MLP ETNs in bull markets and even in neutral markets. The only time MLPL ETFs outperform is in bear markets. Since MLPs have been in a bull market for many years and are likely to continue to outperform, MLP ETFs look like a bad bet. For example, since the Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) launched in August 2010, it has severely underperformed the Alerian MLP ETN (AMJ) by almost 13 percentage points:

Source: Bloomberg

According to Barron’s, although MLP ETFs lose in terms of capital appreciation, they win in terms of cash distributions since their distributions are mostly tax-deferred whereas the distributions of MLP ETNs are not. Pick your poison:

In an individual retirement account, it makes sense to go with the ETN. In a taxable account, if capital appreciation is the most important goal, then the ETN still looks like a good choice. But if dividends are of main concern, then AMLP could fill such a niche.

On the positive side, both MLP ETNs and ETFs provide investors with easy-to-understand 1099 forms rather than the more complicated K-1 forms issued by individual MLPs. MLP funds also do not suffer from unrelated business taxable income (UBTI) issues in tax-deferred retirement accounts, whereas individual MLPs do. So, there is a tradeoff between profits and tax filing simplicity.

Individual MLPs Offer Higher Returns Than Either MLP ETFs or MLP ETNs

Personally, the added tax complexity doesn’t bother me because I let my professional tax preparer deal with it. I want the higher returns that individual MLP investments provide! Individual MLPs offer the best of both worlds in terms of taxation: (1) the tax-deferred cash distributions of MLP ETFs; and (2) the lack of corporate taxation enjoyed by MLP ETNs.

For those of you who care more about easy tax filing, however, I thought it would be helpful to summarize how some of the MLP indices differ and which funds track which indices:

MLP Indices and Corresponding Funds

MLP Index

Funds that Track

Alerian MLP Index (NYSE: ^AMZ)

JPMorgan Alerian MLP Index ETN (NYSE: AMJ)

 

Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index (NYSE: ^AMZI)

  1. Alerian MLP ETF (NYSE: AMLP)

 

  1. UBS E-TRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN (NYSE: MLPI)

 

  1. UBS E-TRACS 2x Monthly Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN (NYSE: MLPL)

 

  1. UBS E-TRACS 1x Monthly Short Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN (NYSE: MLPS)

Cushing 30 MLP Index (Bloomberg: MLPX)

Credit Suisse Cushing 30 MLP Index ETN (NYSE: MLPN)

Tortoise MLP Index (Bloomberg: TMLP)

None, but actively-managed closed-end funds Tortoise Energy Infrastructure (NYSE: TYG) and Kayne Anderson MLP Investment (NYSE: KYN) are close substitutes.

Wells Fargo MLP Index (SNP: ^WMLY)

UBS E-TRACS Wells Fargo MLP Index ETN (NYSE: MLPW)

 

Solactive High Income MLP Index Yorkville High Income MLP ETF (NYSE: YMLP)

 

MLP Index Methodologies

Criteria

Alerian MLP

Alerian MLP  Infrastructure

Cushing 30

Tortoise

Wells Fargo

Number of Holdings

50

25

30

64

66

Weighting Method

Market-cap weighted

Market-cap weighted

Equal weighted

Market-cap weighted

Market-cap weighted

Rebalance Frequency

Quarterly

Quarterly

Quarterly

Quarterly

Quarterly

Market Cap Threshold

$250 million; $500 million preferred

$250 million; $500 million preferred

$500 million

$200 million initial; 20-day average of $175 million prior to rebalance

$200 million initial; 30-day average of $175 million prior to rebalance

Liquidity Threshold

6-month median daily trading volume >= 25,000; 50,000 preferred

6-month median daily trading volume >= 25,000; 50,000 preferred

Trading volume of greater than 500,000 per month for each of past 6 months; annual dollar value >= to 30% of market cap

No

No

Public Float Requirement

Investable Weight Factor >= 20% preferred

Investable Weight Factor >= 20% preferred

Investable Weight Factor >= 20%

No

No

Financial Viability

Four consecutive quarters of distribution >= minimum quarterly distribution

Four consecutive quarters of distribution >= minimum quarterly distribution

Maintained or increased distribution for last four quarters

Distribution >= minimum quarterly distribution

No

Individual Security Weighting Cap

No

 

1st – 2nd:

9.49%

 

3rd – 6th:

6.99%

 

7th – 25th:

4.74%

 

3.33%, since equal weighted

10%

No

Minimum Share Price

Above $5 each trading day during last full month preferred

Above $5 each trading day during last full month preferred

No

No

No

Exploration & Production Companies Included?

Yes

No

No

Yes

Yes

MLPs are Still a Good Buy

With the mad dash to offer new MLP funds, the burning question many investors are asking now is: “is it too late to buy MLPs?” Elliott Gue and Roger Conrad, co-editors of MLP Profits, recently answered a resounding “no” to this question, telling subscribers that MLP fundamentals remain strong:

Strong market performance doesn’t mean a security class is necessarily overvalued. High yields and consistent distribution growth justify the gains posted by MLPs over the long term.

There you have it: MLPs are not overvalued.

Editor’s note: Roger Conrad gives away 6 free MLP stock picks in his special report, The Best MLP Investments to Own Now.

Stock Talk — Post a comment Comment Guidelines

Our Stock Talk section is reserved for productive dialogue pertaining to the content and portfolio recommendations of this service. We reserve the right to remove any comments we feel do not benefit other readers. If you have a general investment comment not related to this article, please post to our Stock Talk page. If you have a personal question about your subscription or need technical help, please contact our customer service team. And if you have any success stories to share with our analysts, they’re always happy to hear them. Note that we may use your kind words in our promotional materials. Thank you.

You must be logged in to post to Stock Talk OR create an account.

Create a new Investing Daily account

  • Use Social Connect
  • - OR -

* Investing Daily will use any information you provide in a manner consistent with our Privacy Policy. Your email address is used for account verification and will remain private.

Stock Talk

  1. avatar
    Phillip Del Nero Reply July 30, 2012 at 7:05 PM EDT

    grab & keep article for reference long-term

  2. avatar
    john Reply June 5, 2012 at 2:09 PM EDT

    Jay, before you try and sound all smart, know what you are talking about. Its UBTI, not UBIT. And it stands for Unrelated Business Taxable Income. Wake up.

  3. avatar
    Jay Reply May 31, 2012 at 2:18 AM EDT

    JKP don’t put MLPs in an account with special tax advantages (like a Roth or Traditional IRA). Great for DRiPs in a regular brokerage account but MLP distributions to a non taxable account (like an IRA) make you subject to UBIT tax, Unearned Business Income Tax. MLPs are great, I own the AMLP ETF myself. But find your yield elsewhere when it comes to the IRA.

  4. avatar
    James k Peters Reply May 29, 2012 at 7:45 PM EDT

    Trying to invest my wife’s IRA. Needing safe product with good yield for years to come. Do MLP’s fill the bill for her??? Thank you.

    JKP

    I have PERSONAL FINANCE MAY 23RD ISSUE. Are those listed possible choices???
    JKP

  5. avatar
    L. Keith Reply March 26, 2012 at 5:40 PM EDT

    EXCELLENT PRESENTATION – Thank you very much!
    L. Keith

  6. Jim Fink
    Jim Fink Reply March 24, 2012 at 2:45 PM EDT

    Hi Ed,

    SRV is an actively-managed closed-end fund, not an index fund. I mention two closed-end funds, but only in the case of a the Tortoise MLP index that does not already have an associated ETF or ETN index fund. In the case of the Cushing 30 MLP index, an ETN already exists (MLPN).

    Best,

    Jim

  7. avatar
    Ed Murdock Reply March 24, 2012 at 11:45 AM EDT

    SRV…….not covered ??

    .Recent Quotes Watchlist My Portfolios Add $10.19 -$0.06 (-0.59%)

    REAL-TIME: Last trade at 4:00 PM EDT on 03/23/12
    THE CUSHING MLP TOTAL RETURN F…

  8. avatar
    JGoodman Reply March 24, 2012 at 8:33 AM EDT

    Do any of these MLPs have dividend reinvestment plans? Thank you. JG

    • Jim Fink
      Jim Fink Reply March 24, 2012 at 10:56 AM EDT

      Hi JG,

      I am not aware of any of the MLP ETNs or ETFs with a DRIP, but some brokers like Schwab and Fidelity will reinvest your dividends in almost any stock commission-free.

      In addition, one individual MLP that I know has a DRIP is Enterprise Products Partners (EPD):

      http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=80547&p=irol-drip

      Best,

      Jim

  9. avatar
    J.P. maguire jR Reply March 22, 2012 at 11:50 PM EDT

    whatDO YOU MEAN THAT MLP’s ARE TAXABLE COULD YOU PLZ
    EXPLAINE SO A LAY PERSON LIKE MYSELF WILL BE ABLE TO SAY “WOW I REALY LEARNED A LOT’!!!!!
    thank you any info will b welcomed
    PEACE
    J.P. MAGUIRE Jr
    IF NEEDED 2013384708
    jonp120@yahoo.com