Account Information

  • My Account

    Manage all your subscriptions, update your address, email preferences and change your password.

  • Help Center

    Get answers to common service questions, ask the analyst or contact our customer service department.

  • My Stock Talk Profile

    Update your stock talk name and/or picture.



Close

GAO Report Tells Americans: Buy More Annuities!

By Jim Fink on January 18, 2013

The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO), a non-partisan federal agency focused on reducing wasteful government spending, has released a report entitled Ensuring Income throughout Retirement Requires Difficult Choices. The two most important choices involve:

  1. Delaying the age when you elect to start receiving Social Security payments; and
  2. Converting your cash-balance defined benefit pension into a lifetime income annuity rather than take a lump-sum payment upon retirement.

Social Security is Not Enough for Retirement

For those of you that think Social Security will meet your retirement needs, wake up! Given the massive debt overhanging the U.S. economy, the current generous benefits being paid out to retirees is not sustainable. As the GAO report states:

The cost of Social Security benefits is projected to exceed sources of funding, and the program is projected to be unable to pay a portion of scheduled benefits by 2036. In 2010, for the first time since 1983, the Social Security trust funds began paying out more in benefits than they received through payroll tax revenue.

Due to the long-term fiscal challenges facing Social Security, options for reform may result in lower benefits and reduced replacement rates from Social Security. As a result, reforms to the Social Security system may increase the need for retirement income from other sources such as private pensions.

Even under the current generous benefit schedule, social security cannot be relied on to fully replace a person’s pre-retirement salary. According to the GAO report, for low-wage earners (i.e., 45% of national average) social security replaces only 55.2% of pre-retirement income and for high-wage earners (i.e., 160% of national average) the replacement rate is only 33.9%. 

Do Not Elect to Receive Social Security Early

Pretty depressing, but even these replacement numbers are only valid if you delay receiving Social Security benefits until you are eligible to receive full benefits. For people born after 1960, full benefits don’t accrue until you reach the age of 67. Although you can elect to start receiving benefits at 62, you receive 25% less per month than you would if you waited until the full retirement age of 67 and 57% less than you would if you waited until age 70.

Unfortunately, our instant-gratification culture has resulted in the vast majority of retirees electing to receive Social Security benefits early, thereby significantly reducing their payments. According to the GAO report, 43.1% elect to take Social Security benefits at the first available opportunity upon reaching the age of 62. Even more astounding, 85.9% of retirees start taking benefits before they reach full retirement age!

If you don’t expect to live very long in retirement, taking early benefits makes sense, but most people are living a long time after retirement – sometimes decades. A husband and wife both aged 65 have a 47 percent chance that at least one of them will live to a 90th birthday and a 20 percent chance of living to a 95th birthday. The extra cash you get between ages 62 and 67 begins to be outweighed by the value of the full-benefit payments you would receive by waiting until 67 if you survive retirement over a 12-year or longer period.

Lifetime Annuities Are an Important Part of Retirement Planning

The other big piece of advice in the GAO report is that middle-class retirees should convert at least half of their retirement savings into a lifetime income annuity. I wrote about the importance of lifetime income annuities in Retirement Investing Part 4: Product Allocation and Sequence of Returns Risk. An annuity pays out for as long as you live — and even longer if you accept a lower payout in exchange for a spousal survivorship benefit or the guaranteed return of your initial cash investment. Furthermore, annuities offer higher payouts than you could get investing the money yourself because recipients receive “mortality credits” from the other annuity participants who die early. Other benefits of annuities – besides higher payments – are insurance against general stock market declines and stupid individual investment decisions, as well as freedom from the burden of managing your own investments as you get older and less capable.

According to the GAO report, a majority of people with defined benefit retirement plans choose to annuitize at least a portion of their retirement cash balances rather than take a lump sum. The problem is that only a third of retirees have defined benefit plans (and most of these are in the public sector). The remaining two-thirds of workers either don’t have access to a retirement plan or are limited to a defined contribution plan like a 401K. And the vast majority of employers that offer these 401K plans are not offering an annuity option. A main reason for employer reluctance is uncertainty over whether the employer would remain liable for retirement payments in the event that the annuity provider fails. The U.S. Treasury Department has promised to remove this employer-liability uncertainty in new regulations to be released soon.

Retirement Education About Annuities is Needed

Of course, even if an employer retirement plan only offers a lump-sum payment, retirees can go to an insurance company and buy their own annuity. However, statistics show that most retirees who are required to put in the effort themselves to find an annuity do not do so. Impediments include a lack of financial education about the benefits of annuities, the lower payments available to individuals outside of company-sponsored annuity plans, and minimum-distribution requirements in 401K plans after age 70 and ½. that make deeply deferred annuities non-compliant.  J. Mark Iwry, deputy assistant Treasury secretary for retirement and health policy, recently announced that the Obama administration wants to “make options for annuitized income more attractive than lump sums,” so hopefully many of these regulatory impediments will not exist much longer.

With regard to financial education, a bill is stalled in Congress entitled the “Lifetime Income Disclosure Act” (S. 267 and H.R.677) that would require employers to provide employees with information on what their lump-sum retirement distributions would look like in annuity form. Keep in mind that this legislation would not require 401K plans to offer an annuity option, but requiring annuity education is better than nothing! There are also bills (S. 2577 and H.R. 4049) that would direct the Treasury and Labor Departments to conduct a study on the feasibility of including a lifetime income annuity option to “automatic IRA” plans.

U.S. Retirement System Does Not Measure Up to World Standards

Taking a global view, the U.S. retirement system is below average. According to the Melbourne Mercer Global Pension Index, The U.S. ranks 9th out of the 18 countries evaluated with an index value of 59.0, which is below the average value of 61.0:

Country

Global Pension Index Value

Denmark 82.9

Netherlands

78.9

Australia

75.7

Sweden

73.4

Switzerland

73.3

Canada

69.2

United Kingdom

64.8

Chile

63.3

United States
59.0

Poland

58.2

Brazil

56.7

Germany

55.3

Singapore

54.8

France

54.7

China

45.4

South Korea 44.7
Japan
44.4

India

42.4

AVERAGE 61.0

An “A” rating, which signifies a “first class and robust” pension system, requires a score of 80 or above, something only Denmark was able to achieve. To receive a “B” rating, which means the pension system has a “sound” structure, the minimum score is 65. The U.S. ranks in the “C” rating category (between 50 and 64.9), which is described as:

A system that has some good features, but also has major risks and/or shortcomings that should be addressed. Without these improvements, its efficacy and/or long-term sustainability can be questioned.

Because some data is imprecise, pension systems with rating differences of less than two points should be considered equivalent. Also keep in mind that while the United Kingdom’s pension system is rated higher than that of the U.S., the U.K.’s “sustainability” index value is only 46.5, so the chances of its rank remaining higher than the U.S. in the future are small. However, the U.S. pension system’s sustainability sub-index value is getting worse, falling slightly from 59.0 in 2010 to 58.4 in 2012.

Bottom line: relying on the U.S. social security pension system to provide adequate monthly income for one’s entire lifetime is a bad bet given the country’s huge debt load and trillion-dollar fiscal deficits. Converting at least a portion of a lump-sum retirement-plan payout into a lifetime income annuity may substantially increase the odds of achieving a comfortable retirement.

Stock Talk — Post a comment Comment Guidelines

Our Stock Talk section is reserved for productive dialogue pertaining to the content and portfolio recommendations of this service. We reserve the right to remove any comments we feel do not benefit other readers. If you have a general investment comment not related to this article, please post to our Stock Talk page. If you have a personal question about your subscription or need technical help, please contact our customer service team. And if you have any success stories to share with our analysts, they’re always happy to hear them. Note that we may use your kind words in our promotional materials. Thank you.

You must be logged in to post to Stock Talk OR create an account.

Create a new Investing Daily account

  • - OR -

* Investing Daily will use any information you provide in a manner consistent with our Privacy Policy. Your email address is used for account verification and will remain private.

Stock Talk

  1. avatar
    Marcia Larson Reply February 1, 2013 at 10:34 AM EDT

    There are a number of articles about the GAO Jan 18 report re annuities but here is a good one.
    GAO says:
    Buy Annuities – the endorsement doesn’t get much better.
    middle class should put at least 50% of savings into lifetime annuity
    education about annuities is needed – great opportunity for us and for advisors

  2. Jim Fink
    Jim Fink Reply April 25, 2012 at 8:55 AM EDT

    Hi Bill,

    Is your bad annuity of the “variable” type? I don’t recommend variable annuities. The GAO is talking about lifetime income annuities based on a fixed rate of return.

    Income annuities = good

    Variable annuities = bad

    Best,

    Jim

  3. avatar
    bill Reply April 25, 2012 at 7:49 AM EDT

    dear linda, i have one annuity that i am very unhappy with.be very careful
    before you sign. insurance companys make a lot of money off annuities!

  4. avatar
    Willie J. Kingston Reply April 23, 2012 at 11:26 AM EDT

    The only way to fix social security is to raise the retirement age to 100 with no early retirement. Of course if people started to live longer than 100, raise the retirement age to 115.

  5. avatar
    linda davy Reply April 22, 2012 at 9:12 AM EDT

    I agree with the annuity premise you are discussing in this article. I have converted 60% of our family’s portfolio to a series of 4 fixed annuities, based on different indexes in the market including S&P, Russell 2000, International indexes, Etc. Each annuity has a different time limit before expiration ranging from 5 years to 12 years and different death benefit guarantees. I no longer feel confident managing our retirement income being directly involved with the ups & downs of the stock and bond markets and the unsure economy that exists in the USA and Europe. Each annuity allows for RMD annual payments. Our state has a $300,000 guarantee for each individual should the insurance company issuing the fixed annuity go bankrupt.

  6. avatar
    Carol Roberts Reply April 21, 2012 at 4:05 PM EDT

    Jim Fink:

    I am about to purchase an immediate premium annuity for life at
    7.53%, no fees. This is a fixed rate. Should I expect such
    an annuity to have inflation built into it? The company is
    solid financially. This is to pay out beginning now. I am
    hung up on whether it should move up with inflation. Please advise
    as I have signed all papers. Thank you, Carol Roberts (Wealth Society)

    • Jim Fink
      Jim Fink Reply April 25, 2012 at 3:23 PM EDT

      Hi Carol,

      An inflation-protection insurance rider costs money, so your annual payout will be reduced if you want inflation protection. So, the question is whether the reduced payout is worth more or less than expected inflation.

      I would advise that you have an insurance expert analyze the rider and calculate what the inflation assumptions are so that you can intelligently decide whether the rider is worth the reduced payout.

      Best,

      Jim

  7. Jim Fink
    Jim Fink Reply April 21, 2012 at 8:59 AM EDT

    Insurance is only as good as the financial strength of the insurance company providing it, so be sure to buy it only from strong companies with a high credit rating.

    Click on the following link:

    http://www.lasallestinsurance.com:8080/index.php?option=com_wrapper&view=wrapper&Itemid=13

    Then check box for “Top 50” and click “next.” Then sort by largest to smallest Comdex rating.

  8. avatar
    Bela Lauber Reply April 21, 2012 at 8:20 AM EDT

    Can you name any good annuity companies