Account Information

  • My Account

    Manage all your subscriptions, update your address, email preferences and change your password.

  • Help Center

    Get answers to common service questions, ask the analyst or contact our customer service department.

  • My Stock Talk Profile

    Update your stock talk name and/or picture.


Turn a $500 Stake into Nearly $2 million – In Just Over a Year

Turn a $500 Stake into Nearly $2 million – In Just Over a YearI know that may sound impossible to believe. But it’s exactly the opportunity a small group of people get each year. And it’s all thanks to a set of alerts so simple, you can read and execute them in your trading account in five minutes or less. We’ve put together a special website that has all the details. Check it out here.



Scaling K-1: Master Limited Partnerships and Taxes

By Peter Staas on January 14, 2011

Master limited partnerships (MLP) have been around for almost three decades–Apache Oil Company, the first such partnership, launched in 1981–but these forbearers differed greatly from the modern-day incarnation. Though intended to facilitate investment in the energy industry, early MLPs gravitated toward exploration and production but also engaged in a wide range of other businesses.

By the end of 1986, there were 34 MLPs that operated outside the oil and gas industry, including offerings involved in restaurants, nursing homes, cable television and mortgage banking.

The modern MLP traces its roots back to the Tax Reform Act of 1986 and the Revenue Act of 1987, which required master limited partnerships to generate at least 90 percent of their income from “qualified” sources–many of which were related to natural resources.

Over the past year energy-focused MLPs have become more popular for the very same reasons as in the mid-1980s: high yields and tax advantages.

Yield chasers have long flocked to MLPs. An article in the March 19, 1987, edition of the Wall Street Journal noted that “in order to be competitive” an MLP needed to offer a 9 to 10 percent yield.

Today, MLPs are an attractive alternative to a frothy bond market, where spreads on high-yield issues appear insufficient to compensate for underlying risks.

And, as pass-through entities, MLPs don’t pay federal income taxes at the corporate level. They spread this responsibility among unitholders.

This tax relief is a huge advantage when these firms compete with traditional corporations for acquisitions. And investors avoid the double taxation to which corporate dividends are subject. (The government taxes corporation’s earnings as well as the dividend payments received by individual investors.)

But superior tax efficiency doesn’t necessarily translate into tax simplicity. A Schedule K-1typically arrives in late February or March and, like the familiar Form 1099, contains information that’s essential to determining your annual tax obligation. Here’s a brief overview of the tax treatment of MLPs.

Mastering Taxes

Individual investors must pay taxes on their share of the partnership’s income as though they generated it themselves. The amount of this paper allocation usually depends on the size of the holding. Because these calculations also factor in any losses, deductions or tax credits that the partnership experienced that year, unitholders are temporarily shielded from bearing the full brunt of the income tax burden. In many cases, these considerations are sizable enough to greatly reduce the amount of immediately taxable income. Once investors decide to sell their position in an MLP, however, they incur these deferred income taxes at the regular tax rate.

The other key component of the K-1 involves the quarterly cash distributions that partnerships disburse to unitholders. Varying in size based on the amount of distributable cash flow generated by the business, these payments are treated as a return of capital that reduces the investors’ original cost basis.

That is, most distributions aren’t taxed when received. Instead, these annualized payouts (along with any deductions) are subtracted from the initial cost of investment, while any income tax paid is added to this figure. When your K-1 indicates that this adjusted cost basis has reached zero, the distributions become taxable at your full income tax rate.

At the same time, because distributions decrease the adjusted basis, they necessarily increase taxable gains that you would incur in the event you sell your MLP units. For example, the difference between the stock sale price and the original basis price would be taxed as long-term capital gains, whereas the difference between the original basis price and adjusted basis price would be taxed at the full income tax rate.

It bears noting that the basis resets to the current market price in the event that the unitholder dies, making these securities an attractive option for estate planning.

This is an undoubtedly convoluted process, and the complexity multiplies when you own several MLP stocks. To reduce headaches when tax season rolls around, we recommend that investors consult with a tax professional.

Also keep in mind the substantial tax benefits that MLP holdings offer: Unitholders typically end up paying annual income tax that represents only 10 to 15 percent of distributed cash. The remainder is deferred until the security is sold, allowing investors to put that money to work in other investments.

MLPs and IRAs: Bad Idea

Although you can technically hold MLP units in an IRA and other tax-exempt investment vehicles, don’t do it.

Placing investments that are already tax-advantaged in a tax-sheltered account isn’t the most efficient allocation of resources; hold MLP units in brokerage accounts and keep your IRAs and 401(k) plans for more traditional fare.

 And there’s an even more compelling reason not to put MLP units in IRA accounts: The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) classifies some income generated by PTPs held in IRAs as unrelated business taxable income (UBTI). That means if total income–not the distributions–associated with one or more MLPs exceeds $1,000, the plan administrator will be forced to file a return and pay an unrelated business income tax (UBIT) from available funds.

Investors interested in the attractive yields and returns offered by MLPs, but leery of navigating the tax complexities might consider a closed-end fund that specializes in these securities. Not only do the fund managers deal with the vagaries of the K-1 and cost basis adjustments–investors receive Form 1099–but income from these funds is exempt from UBIT.

MLP Masters

Looking for more information on MLPs? Elliott Gue and Roger Conrad’s MLP Profits advisory includes proprietary ratings of every publicly-traded partnerships as well as model Portfolios for aggressive and conservative investors and detailed analysis of the latest developments and trends. Click here to register for a no-risk free trial of the service.

Upcoming Appearance

Ellliott Gue, editor of The Energy Letter and The Energy Strategist, will share his take on the global energy markets and related investment opportunities on Jan. 21 at Pastiche Modern Eatery in Tucson, Ariz. The event is hosted by the Tucson Society of the CFA Institute and will get underway 11:45 am. Admission is $30 for nonmembers and $20 for members. For more information on this event and how to RSVP, click here.

Come Sail Away

Also join Elliott Gue aboard Holland America Lines’ ms Eurodam for the 2011 Money Answers Cruise. Departing from Fort Lauderdale on Feb. 12, 2011, for a week-long tour of the Caribbean, my guests will enjoy a week of unparalleled luxury as well as unfettered access to some of the world’s top investing minds.

For more details on this unique opportunity to recharge your batteries and investment portfolio, go to or call 1-800-707-1634.

You might also enjoy…


R.I.P Bull Market—Here’s How To Protect Your Wealth

I hope you’ve enjoyed the phenomenal bull market of the past eight years…

Because it’s about to come to a screeching halt.

The Federal Reserve’s nearly decade-long spending spree has finally come to an end.

With no other options left at their disposal, the Fed has no other choice than to raise interest rates to keep inflation in check.

And that leaves you with two options…

Do nothing and suffer the agony of watching the profits you’ve accumulated over the years evaporate right before your eyes…

Or reposition your portfolio and invest in companies which prosper as inflation rises and interest rates soar.

I think the choice is clear. And I’ll show you the best new positions you can take if you click here.

Stock Talk — Post a comment Comment Guidelines

Our Stock Talk section is reserved for productive dialogue pertaining to the content and portfolio recommendations of this service. We reserve the right to remove any comments we feel do not benefit other readers. If you have a general investment comment not related to this article, please post to our Stock Talk page. If you have a personal question about your subscription or need technical help, please contact our customer service team. And if you have any success stories to share with our analysts, they’re always happy to hear them. Note that we may use your kind words in our promotional materials. Thank you.

You must be logged in to post to Stock Talk OR create an account.

Create a new Investing Daily account

  • - OR -

* Investing Daily will use any information you provide in a manner consistent with our Privacy Policy. Your email address is used for account verification and will remain private.