Revealed: Long Forgotten Income Technique

Revealed: Long Forgotten Income TechniqueA new “calendar” was just released that’s caused quite a stir on Wall Street. It contains the date and time investors can receive payments of $1,150… $1,500… even $2,800. It’s so simple to use that thousands of regular folks are already using it! But you WON’T see this covered on CNBC or Bloomberg. And there’s an important reason for that. Learn why now…


How to Make 50% Per Year in the Stock Market

Small investors can beat Warren Buffett at investing and earn 50% annual returns based on Buffett’s own investment principles. You see, Buffett himself admits that, while he aims to beat the S&P 500 by several percentage points per year on average, he can’t outperform the market by as much as he used to. It’s not because he’s old; it’s because the size of his portfolio is so huge.

According to Warren Buffett’s 2011 shareholder letter, Berkshire Hathaway’s (NYSE: BRK-A) (NYSE: BRK-B) investment portfolio of stocks, bonds and cash totals more than $164 billion! Buffett bemoans the fact that he can no longer buy the high-growth, small-cap stocks that produced such stellar investment returns for Berkshire in its early years.

The larger the pot of money to invest, the worse off investment returns will be. Back in 1999, Buffett was quoted as saying the following:

If I had $10,000 to invest, I would focus on smaller companies because there would be a greater chance that something was overlooked in that arena. The highest rates of return I’ve ever achieved were in the 1950s. I killed the Dow. You ought to see the numbers. But I was investing peanuts then. It’s a huge structural advantage not to have a lot of money. I think I could make you 50% a year on $1 million. No, I know I could. I guarantee that. But you can’t compound $100 million or $1 billion at anything remotely like that rate.

He made a similar comment about size a decade later in 2009: “With tiny sums to invest, it’s extraordinary what you can find. Most of the time, big sums are one hell of an anchor.” It’s not that Buffett can’t find great small-cap stocks, but that these stocks can’t absorb the large amount of capital that Berkshire needs to deploy in order to “move the needle” on Berkshire’s overall performance. So Buffett has to forego the 50% growers and settle for capital-intensive slower growers that can absorb the investment capital he needs to throw at them.

Okay, so the first two criteria for earning 50% annual returns are:

The third criteria – high return and low capital expenditure requirements — can be found in Buffett’s 2009 shareholder letter on page 9:

In earlier days, I shunned capital-intensive businesses such as public utilities. Indeed, the best businesses by far for owners continue to be those that have high returns on capital and that require little incremental investment to grow. We are fortunate to own a number of such businesses, and we would love to buy more.

Buffett provides an example of his ideal business on page 7 of the 2007 shareholder letter:

Let’s look at the prototype of a dream business, our own See’s Candy. The boxed-chocolates industry in which it operates is unexciting: Per-capita consumption in the U.S. is extremely low and doesn’t grow. We bought See’s for $25 million when its pre-tax earnings were less than $5 million. The capital then required to conduct the business was $8 million. Consequently, the company was earning 60% pre-tax on invested capital.

Last year See’s pre-tax profits were $82 million. The capital now required to run the business is $40 million. This means we have had to reinvest only $32 million since 1972 to handle the modest physical growth – and somewhat immodest financial growth – of the business. In the meantime pre-tax earnings have totaled $1.35 billion. All of that, except for the $32 million, has been sent to Berkshire.

Stock Screen for 50% Returns

I think that does it. We now have all of three ingredients needed to generate 50% annual returns. Using my trusty Bloomberg terminal, I ran a stock screen looking for the following criteria:

  • Return on invested capital greater than 20% in at least 4 of the past 5 years
  • At least $5 of operating cash flow for every $1 of capital expense in each of the past two years
  • Market cap less than $3 billion

The screen yielded eight results:


Return on Invested Capital

Operating Cash Flow Per Dollar of Capital Expense

Market Cap

Texas Pacific Land Trust (NYSE: TPL)



$414 million

USANA Health Sciences (NYSE: USNA)



$550 million

Quality Systems (NasdaqGS: QSII)



$2.5 billion

Foster Wheeler (NasdaqGS: FWLT) 25.9% 6.6 $2.7 billion

Arden Group (NasdaqGM: ARDNA)



$271 million

Travelzoo (NasdaqGS: TZOO)



$416 million

PetMed Express (NasdaqGS: PETS)



$242 million

Techne Corp. (NasdaqGS: TECH)



$2.6 billion

Source: Bloomberg

Would buying these eight stocks result in a 50% return over the next year? With S&P 500 companies expected to grow profits 7.7% this year, there’s hope for small company growth as well, but only time will tell.

You might also enjoy…


Retirement Woes Are About to Vanish

Will I have enough money in my retirement years?

That’s the question on the minds of so many Baby Boomers nowadays. But you can set those worries aside.

Because master trader Jim Fink is releasing step-by-step instructions on how to collect a $1,692.50 payment on Thursday… and every Thursday after that.

Jim explains everything in a new presentation—but you only have a few more days to watch it.

Watch it here while there’s still time.

Stock Talk

Ken Savage

Ken Savage

I would love to know how these companies ended up since this article was written in 2012.

I wonder if there’s a tool that will let me enter a few stock symbols and amount invested and tell me what I would make if I bought in say 2010 or 2012.

Anyone know of something like this?

Guest User

Guest User

Jim Fink

Jim Fink

Between March 2, 2012 and April 15, 2015:

TPL: 253.6% gain

USNA: 234.8% gain

QSII: -58.6% loss

FWLT: 11.4% gain (acquired Dec. 3, 2014)

ARDNA: 78.7% gain (acquired Feb. 19, 2014)

TZOO: -60.1% loss

PETS: 68.1% gain

TECH: 48.2% gain

Average gain of Buffett-style portfolio = 72.0%

SPY average gain over comparable periods = 60.2%



Hello Jim

Thanks for this great article! What Bloomberg terminal did you use to be able to run the stock screen ? Also would the same stock screen criteria be relevant in today’s market ? Also how do we use the terminal to run our own screens?


Jim Fink

Jim Fink

Hi Majid,

Bloomberg terminals cost more than $20,000 per year so they are not something that an individual investor can access. Warren Buffett has beaten the market for more than 50 years using these investment criteria, so they are time-tested criteria over many business cycles. You may want to read my article on free stock screeners — along with the comments below the article — to find a screener that is more accessible.





Hi Jim,

I just found your blog and this article is very interesting. Quick question for you? How do you calculate the ROIC for the companies in a fast manner? I have looked into several screeners but I could not find any which had the ROIC as a criteria. In your opinion should I use an average of the last 5 years or the last available? I know this can vary but just as a rule of thumb.


Jim Fink

Jim Fink has 12-month “return on investment” (ROI) as a screen criterion:

Quant-investing has five-year ROIC as a screen criterion:

I think both one-year and five-year time frames for ROIC are important to consider.

Add New Comment

You must be logged in to post to Stock Talk OR create an account