InvestingDaily.com

Account Information

  • My Account

    Manage all your subscriptions, update your address, email preferences and change your password.

  • Help Center

    Get answers to common service questions, ask the analyst or contact our customer service department.

  • My Stock Talk Profile

    Update your stock talk name and/or picture.



Close
FEATURED STRATEGY

This Two-Minute Market Move Could Make You Rich

This Two-Minute Market Move Could Make You Rich[Revealed] How to generate instant income from the stock market. Over and over again. At will. This technique is so powerful – and safe – we’re guaranteeing you can use it to generate $1 million (or more) in retirement cash. And we’ll even send you a $1,000 check to kickstart your journey. Go here for details.

 

Politics & Power: A Primer on the Primaries

By Richard Stavros on March 4, 2016

Would a Trump administration be “yuuuge” for utilities? How about Republican challengers Rubio, Cruz or Kasich? On the Democratic side, would a Clinton or Sanders administration mean a continuation or even expansion of Obama’s clean-energy policies?

With Super Tuesday voters delivering strong leads to frontrunners Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton in the Republican and Democratic primaries, respectively, and the overall field winnowing down to six, the candidates’ energy policies are starting to come into focus, as are their implications for energy investment.

To be sure, candidates will likely moderate their messaging as campaigns shift from marketing themselves to the party faithful who dominate the primaries to the broader electorate that will turn out in November. But just as jokes contain kernels of truth, so do politicians’ ever-changing policy positions.

At the same time, investors should remember that a U.S. president’s impact on investment or economic development is typically indirect.

In fact, I once conducted a study that examined whether presidents truly have the ability to guide something as large and complex as the U.S. economy. The regression analysis that I used incorporated numerous economic indicators to cover the preceding 50-year period.

Contrary to what partisans like to believe, I found no correlation between whether a Democrat or Republican occupied the White House and the economy as a whole. In other words, no party can really claim they are better for the economy, at least when it comes to the presidency.

The main reason for this is because Congress has the power of the purse.

That being said, with GOP majorities in both houses of Congress, a Republican president would have an easier time pursuing dramatic changes in energy policy. By contrast, a Clinton or Sanders administration would likely continue to favor or expand upon Obama’s energy policies, albeit under the constraints of a divided government.

More Renewables or Less?

The dividing line between the six candidates seems to be the degree to which they would support or oppose clean-energy development based on their view of climate change.

The Obama administration has made climate change a central issue by promulgating sweeping new regulations via the Environmental Protection Agency.

Republicans have largely opposed these efforts by arguing that such proposals will harm the economy by making energy use more expensive, while Democrats have countered that businesses should pay the true environmental cost of making their products.

Regardless of personal political beliefs, as investors we have to determine whether the next president’s policies could change the attractiveness of investing in one part of the energy complex versus others.

Though state-level initiatives to expand renewables would likely not be affected, there is a case to be made that Republicans’ dominance in the White House, Congress, the governorships and state legislatures across the country would mean policymaking might start to favor fossil fuels over renewables again.

Conversely, a Democrat in the White House would likely push for further development of renewables, such as wind and solar, as well as continue the move toward natural gas and away from coal, though these policies would likely face opposition from Congress.

Subscribers get to see our guide to which candidates are likely to be a boon for utilities, and which could be a bust.


You might also enjoy…

 

Boost Your Annual Income By As Much As $12,036

We’ve uncovered a unique income-boosting opportunity that allows you to collect up to $1,003 a month in extra government cash. 

This plan is available to everyone over the age of 18.

The amount you make isn’t dependent upon your marital status…

How much money you currently make…

Or even how much money you made in the past.

Best of all, because of the way Uncle Sam views the money that comes from this plan, your current—or future—Social Security benefits won’t be affected, either. 

There’s still time to get your name on the list for the next check run. 

I’ll show you how here.

Stock Talk — Post a comment Comment Guidelines

Our Stock Talk section is reserved for productive dialogue pertaining to the content and portfolio recommendations of this service. We reserve the right to remove any comments we feel do not benefit other readers. If you have a general investment comment not related to this article, please post to our Stock Talk page. If you have a personal question about your subscription or need technical help, please contact our customer service team. And if you have any success stories to share with our analysts, they’re always happy to hear them. Note that we may use your kind words in our promotional materials. Thank you.

You must be logged in to post to Stock Talk OR create an account.

Create a new Investing Daily account

  • - OR -

* Investing Daily will use any information you provide in a manner consistent with our Privacy Policy. Your email address is used for account verification and will remain private.