Close

Trump Threat to Saudis Rings Hollow

Thus far I haven’t spent any time discussing the energy policy proposals of the presidential candidates. I suppose at some point I should address the implications of the notion put forth by the leading Democratic candidates that they would ban fracking (now responsible for 50% of U.S. oil production), but today I want to briefly comment on an idea put forth by Donald Trump.  

Last week the Republican presidential front-runner said he would consider boycotting oil from Saudi Arabia unless the Saudi government provides troops to fight ISIS. I am not going to delve into the politics of the Middle East today, but rather discuss whether Trump’s threat is realistic.

First, let’s look at the source of U.S. oil imports in 2015. Here are the top 10 suppliers of crude oil to the U.S. in 2015. Amounts are in thousands of barrels per day:

160330TELusoilimporters

As a result of the surge in U.S. oil production that was enabled by hydraulic fracturing — which Bernie Sanders vows to ban and Hillary Clinton vows to severely limit — U.S. crude imports fell from 10.1 million barrels per day (bpd) in 2005 to 7.4 million bpd in 2015.

Canada was by far our biggest foreign supplier in 2015 at 3.17 million bpd. That accounted for 43.1% of U.S. crude oil imports, and represented a near-doubling in volume from 10 years earlier. The U.S. presently consumes almost 70% of Canada’s oil output.

Saudi Arabia was our second-largest source of imports, supplying 1.05 million bpd in 2015. This represented 14.3% of U.S. crude imports, and a volume drop of 27.3% from 2005. But over that time frame global demand for crude surged, so Saudi Arabia had no trouble finding customers for its crude. In fact, Saudi Arabia has substantially ramped up its production since 2005, so the decline in exports to the U.S. wasn’t because it doesn’t have sufficient oil to export (which is increasingly an issue for Venezuela and Mexico, our #3 and #4 suppliers of crude oil).

So, going back to Trump’s proposal, is it reasonable to boycott oil from Saudi Arabia considering that it is still such an important supplier to the U.S.? Sure, we could decide not to purchase the 1 million bpd we currently get from them.

We’d obviously need to make up the shortfall from other countries, which in turn takes the same 1 million bpd of supply off the global market. But guess who suddenly has 1 million bpd of spare export capacity to fill that void? Saudi Arabia, of course. Yes, oil is a globally traded, fungible commodity. Short of financial sanctions like those used until very recently to stifle Iranian exports, boycotting Saudi crude would have minimal economic impact on that country given the global scale of the oil trade.

To really hurt Saudi Arabia unilaterally, we would need to curb U.S. imports. That could be accomplished with a combination of higher U.S. oil production and lower demand, but those conditions typically result from higher oil prices.

Come to think of it, that’s just what the ailing shale oil producers need. I can envision the campaign slogan now: “Vote Trump for higher oil prices. You’re welcome, America.”         

(Follow Robert Rapier on Twitter, LinkedIn, or Facebook.)

 

 


You might also enjoy…

 

Retirement Woes Are About to Vanish

Will I have enough money in my retirement years?

That’s the question on the minds of so many Baby Boomers nowadays. But you can set those worries aside.

Because master trader Jim Fink is releasing step-by-step instructions on how to collect a $1,692.50 payment on Thursday… and every Thursday after that.

Jim explains everything in a new presentation—but you only have a few more days to watch it.

Watch it here while there’s still time.

Stock Talk

Judith Abeles

Judith Abeles

Thank you for pointing out the distinction between Clinton’s position on fracking, and Sanders’. Clinton would limit fracking only in areas that present a danger to the health of nearby residents. That should have been made more clear. More of the American public should be made aware of the benefit of domestic production for our economy, versus importation. We have long sought energy independence, and now we are on the cusp of achieving it. More Americans, especially Sanders supporters should be made aware of this. Trump may have inadvertently started the conversation about energy imports vs. energy independence. This is no time for draconian solutions.

Add New Comment

You must be logged in to post to Stock Talk OR create an account