Account Information

  • My Account

    Manage all your subscriptions, update your address, email preferences and change your password.

  • Help Center

    Get answers to common service questions, ask the analyst or contact our customer service department.

  • My Stock Talk Profile

    Update your stock talk name and/or picture.


An Interview With Linda McDonough

By ID Analysts on April 4, 2016

Investing Daily’s Director of Portfolio Strategy Jim Pearce recently sat down for a one-on-one interview with Linda McDonough to discuss her “Profit Catalyst” trading strategy. Below is the transcript of that discussion, including how Linda determines whether a “fundamental shift” is actually taking place in a stock she’s following.


Now I’ve been an investment advisor for 30 years, but you’re the first person I’ve come across with an investing model like yours. Can you give us sense for the kind of track record it’s had?


I have, and thankfully it works quite well. So basically what often happens is people look for stocks that are a good value, they’re cheap.

And when you buy a stock like that typically the stock isn’t moving that much, it’s been pretty flat or languishing a bit. What I prefer to do instead is actually wait until there’s a fundamental change in a business before buying.

But it’s not just the momentum and trading volume I analyze, I want to make sure these stocks have sound balance sheets; they’re generating significant cash flow. And that they’re valued where the stock will go higher in the future.

When those things all lineup, I’ve seen a lot of stocks go on to double or triple.


Right, so there’s an old saying on Wall Street “Buy on the rumor, sell on the news.”  When you talk about these “fundamental shifts” I take it’s more sophisticated than just hearing that something is happening and buying?


It is, in fact I try to wait until any rumors have dissipated and actual news hits. And in doing that sometimes you miss the first 10% or so move in a stock.

But I’m okay with that, because what you do is you also eliminate a lot of the risk because you’ve waited until the news has actually happened – and then you benefit as that fundamental change bears fruit in the future.


So in that case, are your strong performance results the fact that investors aren’t appreciating the news that’s being reported?


That’s part of it. One part of it is that the investors don’t appreciate it. But the other part is that often when something is brand new, whether it’s a new customer, new product line, or maybe something like geographic expansion, I’ve found that the companies themselves don’t know the full potential of the news. So they actually understate it to the investment community.

So I’m looking for that kind of news. News that will create a change over a longer period, something that will help the business for the foreseeable future.


So what’s an example of a company in the last year or two you did pick where things worked out as expected?


Sure, for example AbioMed is a company with a heart device and they had a very narrow indication with the FDA. [Editors note: an “indication” refers to the particular ailment a medical treatment is approved for by the FDA]

And they were still selling some products that way and doing okay, but what happened is that they got a much broader indication from the FDA that opened up a massive new market for them. Its market expanded considerably, and the stock has gone on to double and continues to rise.


Now, this system isn’t just theoretical, I mean you’ve been testing this and refining it for a long time. You actually have a long track record of doing similar trades like this from earlier in your career, and you’ve tracked the results?


Absolutely, and that’s how I came to this more scientific methodology. I was doing this before while working as a hedge fund analyst, but it took some trial and error to really formalize the approach and figure out all of the moving parts.


And this isn’t day trading as I understand it, when you buy a stock you stay committed to it for a longer period of time, correct?


I’m in them for a while, honestly when I see the big volume spike and the price goes up man times the stock tends to settle down for a while, and then sometimes it might be a month or so before it starts moving again. But all in all I look for events meaningful enough to drive a stock for multi-year periods.


How do you know when to sell a stock?


What I do, is whenever I look at a stock I have a target based on earnings and growth rates. Every quarter, I go back and reassess that target and if the stock hits it’s basically time to sell!

Stock Talk — Post a comment Comment Guidelines

Our Stock Talk section is reserved for productive dialogue pertaining to the content and portfolio recommendations of this service. We reserve the right to remove any comments we feel do not benefit other readers. If you have a general investment comment not related to this article, please post to our Stock Talk page. If you have a personal question about your subscription or need technical help, please contact our customer service team. And if you have any success stories to share with our analysts, they’re always happy to hear them. Note that we may use your kind words in our promotional materials. Thank you.

You must be logged in to post to Stock Talk OR create an account.

Create a new Investing Daily account

  • - OR -

* Investing Daily will use any information you provide in a manner consistent with our Privacy Policy. Your email address is used for account verification and will remain private.