Comparing Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio and Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA) for Measuring Stock Value

When evaluating the value of a stock, investors often consider various financial ratios and metrics to make informed decisions. Most investors have heard of the commonly used Price to Earnings (P/E) ratio. The P/E ratio is routinely listed when displaying basic information about a company.

Fewer investors are familiar with the Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA) ratio, but I believe it provides more useful information for evaluating a company’s value. Let’s look at the differences between the two metrics, comparing the advantages and limitations of each.

Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio

Analysts calculate the P/E ratio by dividing the current market price of a stock by its earnings per share (EPS). It represents how much investors are willing to pay for each dollar of earnings.

The price of the stock is straightforward, but two different types of earnings may be used in computing a stock’s value.

The most conservative measure is Trailing Twelve Months (TTM) earnings. This earnings per share (EPS) over the trailing twelve months is the most common measure used. This means the P/E ratio is based on the sum of the company’s earnings over the past four quarters.

Sometimes, analysts use projected or forward earnings, which are the estimated earnings for the next fiscal year. The forward P/E ratio offers insight into how the market values a company’s future earnings potential. For a company projected to undergo rapid growth, this can be a more insightful measure than using TTM earnings. Some companies may look expensive based on last year’s earnings, but the current share price may be a bargain when looking at forward earnings.

Use of the P/E ratio has several advantages:

  • Simplicity and Popularity: The P/E ratio is easy to understand and widely used by investors, making it a popular metric for quick comparisons.
  • Profitability Focus: It directly links the company’s earnings to its stock price, making it useful for evaluating profitability.
  • Historical Comparison: It allows for easy comparison with historical P/E ratios of the same company or with other companies in the same sector.

However, there are a number of disadvantages and limitations from using P/E ratio to calculate a company’s value:

  • Earnings Manipulation: Accounting practices can influence EPS, potentially distorting the ratio.
  • Cyclical Companies: For companies with cyclical earnings, the P/E ratio can fluctuate widely, making it less reliable.
  • Negative Earnings: If a company has negative earnings, the P/E ratio becomes meaningless or misleading.
  • Ignores Debt: It doesn’t account for the company’s debt or capital structure, which can impact overall value and risk.

The latter limitation is a major reason for considering the EV/EBITDA ratio.

Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA) Ratio

Analysts calculate the EV/EBITDA ratio by dividing a company’s enterprise value (EV) by its earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA). Enterprise value is the total value of a company, including market capitalization, debt, and excluding cash.

EV is calculated as Market Capitalization + Total Debt + Preferred Equity + Minority Interest−Cash and Cash Equivalents

Assume a company has the following financial data:

  • Market Capitalization: $500 million
  • Total Debt: $200 million
  • Preferred Equity: $50 million
  • Minority Interest: $30 million
  • Cash and Cash Equivalents: $70 million

Using the EV formula: EV = $500 million + $200 million + $50 million +$30 million − $70 million = $710 million.

This measure becomes especially important for companies that are significantly in debt.

The advantages of the EV/EBITDA ratio are:

  • Comprehensive Value: EV includes debt and cash, providing a fuller picture of the company’s value than market cap alone.
  • Debt Neutrality: The ratio of EBITDA remains unaffected by a company’s capital structure, making it useful for comparing companies with different debt levels.
  • Useful for Non-Profitable Companies: EV/EBITDA can be applied to companies with negative net income but positive EBITDA, unlike the P/E ratio.
  • Operating Performance: It focuses on operating performance and excludes non-operating factors, providing a clearer view of operational efficiency.

However, there are some limitations:

  • Excludes Non-Cash Items: EBITDA excludes depreciation and amortization, which can overlook significant expenses for asset-intensive companies.
  • Less Useful for Certain Sectors: For financial firms or those where debt is integral to operations, this ratio might be less meaningful.
  • Assumes No Future Investment: Ignores potential future capital expenditures required to maintain or grow the business.

Comparison and Use Cases

P/E ratio is best for companies with consistent earnings and clear profitability. It is particularly useful for evaluating companies within the same industry. Investors typically use P/E when looking for growth and valuation based on earnings.

EV/EBITDA ratio is best for comparing companies with different capital structures or in industries where debt levels vary significantly. Companies in capital-intensive industries prefer this method, and investors use it to understand enterprise value and operational efficiency without the distortions of capital structure differences.

For industries with significant debt, EV/EBITDA provides a clearer comparison of operating performance.

P/E is more relevant for established companies with stable earnings, while EV/EBITDA can be more insightful for companies with significant reinvestment needs or high debt.

Both the P/E ratio and EV/EBITDA ratio have their distinct advantages and limitations. Analysts and investors choose between these methods based largely on the company’s specific context, its industry, and whether they focus on earnings or broader enterprise value. Using both metrics together can often provide a more rounded view of a company’s value and performance.

Editor’s Note: Why are certain cannabis stocks jumping +1,000%? It has to do with seasonality…specifically, the U.S. presidential election.

It happens every four years. No matter who’s running for office. During the previous presidential election cycle, you had a chance to grab 569%… 1,020%… 2,426% and higher. Now it’s happening again, and you’ve no time to lose.

I’m the editorial director of Investing Daily. I’m also the editor-in-chief of our premium trading service Marijuana Profit Alert. To find the best cannabis stocks, you need to conduct due diligence.

The good news is, I’ve done the homework for you. For Marijuana Profit Alert, I’ve put together a portfolio of the best-of-breed marijuana equities. These holdings are poised to soar during this political season. If you’re fortunate enough to own these companies, you’ll reap a windfall.

Don’t leave money on the table. Make your move now, before the investment herd. Learn about my next trades. Click here.