Account Information

  • My Account

    Manage all your subscriptions, update your address, email preferences and change your password.

  • Help Center

    Get answers to common service questions, ask the analyst or contact our customer service department.

  • My Stock Talk Profile

    Update your stock talk name and/or picture.


How To Collect Your Share of My Million Dollar Giveaway

How To Collect Your Share of My Million Dollar GiveawayWe recently kicked off the most outrageous initiative in the history of investment research. It’s called the Income Millionaire Project. And the goal is simple: create 1,000 income millionaires. That’s a $1 billion goal! No one has ever tried it before, but that doesn’t bother me. I’m so sure you can use this program to make a million bucks… I’ll pay you $1,000 to start your journey. Go here for details.


Hate It for the Crash, Love It for Its Cash

By Robert Frick on October 9, 2015

The financial industry—particularly big banks and mortgage lenders—still has a PR problem, but it doesn’t have a profits problem. And those profits support our choice of financial firms in our Personal Finance portfolios. Further evidence of this came this week in a new report.

New York Federal Reserve economists said that from 2009 to 2014 J.P. Morgan, Citigroup, Bank of America, Goldman Sacks and Morgan Stanley had a combined average annual net income of $41.73 billion, up from $25.08 billion per year from 2002 to 2008.

You’d think with all the carping about how tough new rules have hamstrung the financial sector, financial firms would be making less money, not more. But higher capital requirements (meant to cover losses from bad bets) and other rules to help avoid another 2008 meltdown don’t seem to have put a dent in the financial sector’s ability to make money.

And in investing, the difference between reality and perception is often an opportunity to make money.

The perception of banks is still negative, seven years after the financial crash. A Gallup report in June said that just 28% of people “have a great deal or quite a lot of confidence in the banks.” That’s up from the low point of 21% in 2012’s poll, but below the 40% average Gallup says the banking industry rated the past 35 years. In 1979, banks peaked at 60%, according to the report, titled “Why It’s Still Cool to Hate Banks.”

I suspect much of the rhetoric about banking regulations is politically motivated, and part of the “remove regulations and lower taxes to spur economic growth” philosophy espoused by many candidates.

But obviously, from the figures above, regulations haven’t depressed big bank earnings. Nor have they stifled small banks’ ability to lend—another claim made by the set-my-bankers-free contingent. In a column by Barry Ritholtz for BloombergView, he quotes American Enterprise Institute scholar Peter Wallison as claiming Dodd-Frank “has burdened small banks—and the business that rely on them—much more than large businesses that have access to capital markets. Is this why we’re experiencing the slowest recovery in two generations?”

Then Ritholtz shows a graph with data from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis that proves commercial lending by small banks has zoomed up at the same rate as before the and real estate crashes.

So while financials may not give you warm fuzzy feelings, it would be a mistake not to consider them for your portfolio. In our Personal Finance Income Portfolio, for example, we have Umpqua Holdings (UMPQ), a company with banks, mortgage banking and other financial services, and which yields a sweet 3.8%. Also in that portfolio, People’s United Financial, yielding 4.2%.

Our Growth Portfolio includes Ameriprise Financial (AMP; 2.4%), U.S. Bancorp (USB; 2.44% yield) and Wells Fargo (WFC; 2.9%).

We’re also seeing the same phenomenon of stable financial companies at good prices north of the border. Our sister publication, Canadian Edge, has five finance companies with yields in the 3% to 4%-plus range, and given the Canadian dollar trades at a low point versus the U.S. dollar, those companies have the added feature of big capital appreciation when the currency situation normalizes.

So you may still be sore at bankers and think some should have gone to jail, but as long as they’re free to make money, have them make some for you.

You might also enjoy…


Forget Buy and Hold. Here’s how to retire faster…

I’m not a fan of “buy and hold.” Gurus like to tell you that patience is the key, but I call horse puckey.

We’ve discovered an investing technique that consistently pays out easy-to-repeat profits.

One that’s proven to beat the market 2,082% in head-to-head testing.

And one that’s generated over 488 winners since 2011.

This method is so powerful, in fact, some of the investors we’ve let use it reported back to us saying they’ve made $71,425… $82,371… and even as much as $151,000 in a single year thanks to this “trick.”

That’s how powerful this investing technique is!

What what exactly is this mysterious method? I’ve put all the details together here.

Stock Talk — Post a comment Comment Guidelines

Our Stock Talk section is reserved for productive dialogue pertaining to the content and portfolio recommendations of this service. We reserve the right to remove any comments we feel do not benefit other readers. If you have a general investment comment not related to this article, please post to our Stock Talk page. If you have a personal question about your subscription or need technical help, please contact our customer service team. And if you have any success stories to share with our analysts, they’re always happy to hear them. Note that we may use your kind words in our promotional materials. Thank you.

You must be logged in to post to Stock Talk OR create an account.

Create a new Investing Daily account

  • - OR -

* Investing Daily will use any information you provide in a manner consistent with our Privacy Policy. Your email address is used for account verification and will remain private.