Account Information

  • My Account

    Manage all your subscriptions, update your address, email preferences and change your password.

  • Help Center

    Get answers to common service questions, ask the analyst or contact our customer service department.

  • My Stock Talk Profile

    Update your stock talk name and/or picture.


How To Collect Your Share of My Million Dollar Giveaway

How To Collect Your Share of My Million Dollar GiveawayWe recently kicked off the most outrageous initiative in the history of investment research. It’s called the Income Millionaire Project. And the goal is simple: create 1,000 income millionaires. That’s a $1 billion goal! No one has ever tried it before, but that doesn’t bother me. I’m so sure you can use this program to make a million bucks… I’ll pay you $1,000 to start your journey. Go here for details.


Power Grab for Coal

By Robert Rapier on January 17, 2017

Regular readers may know that I have been bearish on the long-term outlook of coal for several years. As a general rule, we have steered investors away from the sector. But that general rule isn’t a steadfast rule, because there are times that the coal sector will be oversold.

That was the case in the first half of 2016 as we added several coal stocks to The Energy Strategist portfolios near the lows and then rode them to huge gains for the remainder of the year. In October we recommended three more coal producers. We weren’t counting on Donald Trump’s upset win in the presidential election, but didn’t mind the double-digit gains this trio scored the next day.

Underpinning this coal exposure is our conviction that rising natural gas prices will lead more utilities to switch back to coal this winter. Though natural gas overtook coal as the leading fuel for power generation in 2016, the Energy Information Administration (EIA)  recently projected that the pendulum would swing back to coal this winter.

Some power producers have the option to use either coal or natural gas to generate power. The following graphic from the EIA illustrates the recent trend in the relative prices of these competing fuels:


Mind the footnote indicating that the heat rate of natural gas is lower than that of coal. That means that natural gas will generate more power than coal with the same energy content. In other words, natural gas is a more efficient power plant fuel.

The graphic shows that in 2015, when natural gas cost about $3.10 per million British thermal units (MMBtu) and coal was about $2.25/MMBtu, natural gas was as profitable to burn as coal with the same thermal content. Note that (not coincidentally), this ratio of $2.25 to $3.10 is the same as the ratio of the heat rate required to produce 1 kilowatt hour (kWh) of power via natural gas or coal (7,200/10,000).

In other words, we can calculate that when the price of coal is above 72% of the price of natural gas per MMBtu, utilities will favor natural gas (all other factors being equal; more on that below).

That was the case for the first half of 2016, and that helped natural gas overtake coal in power production on an annual basis for the first time ever:


As natural gas prices rise above $3/MMBtu (assuming current coal prices), utilities have dwindling economic incentive to burn natural gas rather than coal. But the shale gas boom over the past decade has driven natural gas prices below $3/MMBtu fairly regularly in recent years. That helps explain why natural gas has rapidly displaced coal in power production.

In reality, coal needs to be even cheaper to be competitive, because all things are not equal. Environmental regulations are the wild card. Absent such rules, coal at less than 72% of the price of natural gas per unit of heat content becomes competitive. In fact, the threshold price at which coal becomes the cheaper option is even lower as a result of environmental regulations, many at the state level, aimed at limiting pollution and global warming.

Federal environmental regulations on coal will be one target of the incoming Trump Administration. A relaxation of those rules would nudge coal’s ceiling closer to that 72% breakeven point against natural gas.

There are a few more complicating factors beyond fuel efficiency and environmental regulations. Capital construction costs, fuel delivery costs and long-term fuel supply contracts that may limit a utility’s ability to shift back and forth.         

The long-term shift toward natural gas will likely continue, but in recent months coal has traded at only about 60% of the cost of natural gas on an energy equivalent basis. That is a price point that has historically led to a short-term shift back to coal, and this time is no different. Hopefully now you have a bit more insight into the reasons.

Join us at The Energy Strategist for profitable investment advice capitalizing on this trend.

(Follow Robert Rapier on Twitter, LinkedIn, or Facebook.)


You might also enjoy…


Forget Buy and Hold. Here’s how to retire faster…

I’m not a fan of “buy and hold.” Gurus like to tell you that patience is the key, but I call horse puckey.

We’ve discovered an investing technique that consistently pays out easy-to-repeat profits.

One that’s proven to beat the market 2,082% in head-to-head testing.

And one that’s generated over 488 winners since 2011.

This method is so powerful, in fact, some of the investors we’ve let use it reported back to us saying they’ve made $71,425… $82,371… and even as much as $151,000 in a single year thanks to this “trick.”

That’s how powerful this investing technique is!

What what exactly is this mysterious method? I’ve put all the details together here.

Stock Talk — Post a comment Comment Guidelines

Our Stock Talk section is reserved for productive dialogue pertaining to the content and portfolio recommendations of this service. We reserve the right to remove any comments we feel do not benefit other readers. If you have a general investment comment not related to this article, please post to our Stock Talk page. If you have a personal question about your subscription or need technical help, please contact our customer service team. And if you have any success stories to share with our analysts, they’re always happy to hear them. Note that we may use your kind words in our promotional materials. Thank you.

You must be logged in to post to Stock Talk OR create an account.

Create a new Investing Daily account

  • - OR -

* Investing Daily will use any information you provide in a manner consistent with our Privacy Policy. Your email address is used for account verification and will remain private.

Stock Talk

  1. avatar
    Caryn Yeoh Reply February 25, 2018 at 9:45 AM EDT

    Robert, can you please share your viewpoint on ARLP ?