InvestingDaily.com

Account Information

  • My Account

    Manage all your subscriptions, update your address, email preferences and change your password.

  • Help Center

    Get answers to common service questions, ask the analyst or contact our customer service department.

  • My Stock Talk Profile

    Update your stock talk name and/or picture.



Close
FEATURED STRATEGY

A rare opportunity to collect more government cash

A rare opportunity to collect more government cashIf you’re over the age of 18, you’re eligible to collect up to $1,003 a month in extra government cash. That’s not an exaggeration! My research proves that every single person who ever applied to the program I’d like to show you today had the chance to receive a check. Better still, all it took was about 90 seconds of their time and a small membership fee of about $20. Get the details here.

 

Last Days of RINsanity

By Robert Rapier on March 7, 2017

Last week reports emerged suggesting the Trump administration will soon change the U.S. biofuel program in response to the long-standing grievances of the nation’s refiners.

The issue is complex, so a popular reader comment below such stories is some variation of “What does this actually mean?” Today I will try to answer that clearly and concisely, while highlighting the threats and opportunities for investors.

Briefly, the U.S. legislation requires that gasoline sold nationwide contain some 10% ethanol, though the law lets the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) set the precise annual biofuel quota.

The EPA tracks compliance by assigning each gallon of ethanol used a unique serial number known as the Renewable Identification Number, or RIN. Ultimately, “obligated parties” — as of now predominantly the refiners — must verify ethanol mandate compliance by submitting to the EPA a number of RINs proportional to their gasoline output. (The same system applies to other biofuels, but the RIN values differ according to the type of biofuel).

But many refiners don’t blend in the ethanol themselves; this task is often the preserve of fuel shippers and wholesalers. Those gasoline producers have to buy their RINs in a largely unregulated market from ethanol suppliers, blenders of gasoline or financial speculators.

In the early years of ethanol quotas, the RINs represented a tiny proportion of the price of wholesale fuel. More recently, the cost has soared. Valero (NYSE: VLO), for instance, said RIN compliance cost it $217 million in the fourth quarter of 2016 and $750 million for the entire year, with similar expense forecast for 2017. For reference, Valero reported 2016 adjusted net income attributable to stockholders of $1.7 billion, so RIN compliance consumed just over 30% of the profit by that measure.    

Valero and other refiners have lobbied to shift the compliance cost by designating the fuel distributors responsible for the blending as the “obligated party.” The RINs would have to be turned in by the party that holds title to the fuel immediately prior to sale from the bulk transfer/terminal system to a wholesaler, retailer or ultimate consumer. These are the same parties required to report federal excise tax liability for the gasoline or diesel.

Valero’s ultimate objection is that only the fuel blenders can decide how much ethanol gets blended. They are the ones who effectively create the RINs, so they should be the ones to turn them in, which would give them the incentive to use more ethanol. Valero argues that this change would substantially reduce the opportunities for fraud and speculation involving RINs.

Who opposes such a move? Obviously the fuel marketers and retailers who do the blending, many of them now profiting from selling RINs to the refiners. Murphy USA (NYSE: MUSA) was one singled out by Valero in its petition to have the rule changed.

Renewable fuel groups have also fought to preserve the current system. Why would they oppose change? I think their primary fear is that shifting the large compliance obligation to the blenders, which are typically smaller than the multi-billion-dollar refiners, could cause a backlash against renewable fuel mandate as a whole. It could open a can of worms they would rather leave closed.    

So what’s going to happen? Last week the Renewable Fuels Association (RFA) claimed it had been told that the White House was going to shift the RIN compliance burden. The White House denied such an order is pending.

But Carl Icahn has long been a vocal critic of the current arrangement. He is majority owner of the refiner CVR Energy (NYSE: CVI). More importantly, he is advising President Trump on the issue.

Expect the change to happen. It’s likely to hurt ethanol producers in the long run, and should improve the fortunes of some refiners at the expense of marketers and retailers. The change  could also reopen the debate about the cost of the nation’s biofuel mandates.

This policy shift is going to create winners and losers. Join us at The Energy Strategist to profit.

(Follow Robert Rapier on Twitter, LinkedIn, or Facebook.)

 


You might also enjoy…

 

12 Stocks Virtually Guaranteed to Go Up in 2018

You may not believe it, but I have a calendar in my hands right now that tells me the exact date and time when a few stock are practically guaranteed to go up. 

Twelve of them, in fact.

And if you were to invest in them following the simple buy and sell instructions found in this calendar…

You could be making $1,181… $11,814…. and as much as $190,916 more than by using a “buy-and-hold” strategy.

And here’s the best part…

I’m giving away a few copies of this calendar to interested investors (First come, first served).

With this calendar, you could get higher profits with less risk.

Click here to get the full story, and to claim your copy.

Stock Talk — Post a comment Comment Guidelines

Our Stock Talk section is reserved for productive dialogue pertaining to the content and portfolio recommendations of this service. We reserve the right to remove any comments we feel do not benefit other readers. If you have a general investment comment not related to this article, please post to our Stock Talk page. If you have a personal question about your subscription or need technical help, please contact our customer service team. And if you have any success stories to share with our analysts, they’re always happy to hear them. Note that we may use your kind words in our promotional materials. Thank you.

You must be logged in to post to Stock Talk OR create an account.

Create a new Investing Daily account

  • - OR -

* Investing Daily will use any information you provide in a manner consistent with our Privacy Policy. Your email address is used for account verification and will remain private.