Account Information

  • My Account

    Manage all your subscriptions, update your address, email preferences and change your password.

  • Help Center

    Get answers to common service questions, ask the analyst or contact our customer service department.

  • My Stock Talk Profile

    Update your stock talk name and/or picture.


These contrarian stocks thrive in good markets and bad

These contrarian stocks thrive in good markets and badIn my new profit guide, I reveal a group of super-safe stocks that don’t behave like regular stocks during market downturns. In fact, these rock-solid beauties historically SKYROCKET and THRIVE during the worst of times. During the last three market busts, stocks in this contrarian sector soared 42%… 135%… and even 200%. Do yourself a favor. Check out my free profit guide today.


China’s Hidden Agenda Behind Announcement

By Stephen Leeb on September 25, 2017

Earlier this month, a pronouncement by China fueled rallies in a number of car companies, both Chinese and non-Chinese. But as is usually true when it comes to China, there are layers of meaning to peel away to get at the more significant story.

The announcement was that China planned to ban the sale of cars with internal combustion engines, as a few other countries, including Britain and France, had previously said they planned to do. The market took the words to heart as signaling a big boon to makers of electric vehicles, with China’s BYD Company (OTCMKTS: BYDDF) – a denizen of our Real World Investing portfolio (and a company 25 percent-owned by Warren Buffett) – leading the way with a 50 percent gain. Other Chinese automakers including Geely (OTCMKTS: GELYF) also were up sharply, while General Motors (NYSE: GM) and Tesla (Nasdaq: TSLA) staged rallies as well, though a bit less vigorous than for their Chinese competitors.

The rallies in the non-Chinese automakers likely reflected reports that China might loosen its requirements on ownership of foreign ventures. Currently foreign companies that want to operate in China must do so as a joint venture with a Chinese company that is granted a majority share. It has been widely bruited that future foreign auto projects domiciled in China might be allowed to function with majority foreign ownership. Some stories even suggested that foreigners – subject to certain provisos, such as a severe limit on exports – might be permitted to keep 100 percent ownership.

Returning to China’s plans to ban gasoline-powered car sales, as I suggested above it rarely pays to take what China says at simple face value. It’s not that I think the government is outright dissembling. Rather, I suspect that China has additional agendas beyond the surface goal of slashing pollution.

One clue came just one day after the announcement was made, when the Chinese government announced it was pushing off the launch date for its plans by a year, to 2019 instead of 2018. Those plans called for carmakers to institute a type of cap and trade system in which they are assigned quotas for electric cars. Companies that fall short will have to buy points from companies that exceed their quotas. Carmakers had balked at having to implement the requirements so quickly. The fact that the government so quickly changed the starting date bespeaks the ad hoc nature of these noble plans.

And it raised in my mind the question of why the government had bothered to announce the goal without ever offering a year by which it expected to achieve it. That, in turn, brings up yet another issue. China has said that it wants to sell 7 million electric vehicles a year by some time in the 2020s, a figure that would represent approximately 20 percent of the country’s total car sales by then. Getting to 100 percent from 20 percent is clearly going to be a long haul. Estimates by Bloomberg, which is among one of the most optimistic analysts when it comes to the future of EV’s, suggest it won’t be until 2038 that worldwide EV sales surpass sales of conventional cars. And how long after that will it be before only EVs are being sold? Remember, what counts when it comes to pollution from vehicles isn’t single-year sales of EVs but rather the percentage EVs represent of the entire universe of cars on the road. The above brief analysis suggests that EVs won’t be making a major dent in that universe until 2050 or later.

Here’s the point: the Chinese do, indeed, want to ramp up EV production as fast as possible. But common sense suggests that the announcement about replacing conventional sales with EV sales not only was premature in that China hadn’t worked out the details, but also wasn’t particularly meaningful.

So why the hurry in making the announcement? As I detail here, the Chinese have secured for themselves supplies of virtually every critical component needed to make both the engines and the batteries of EVs. By proclaiming its commitment to EVs as a pollution-fighting government priority, China has created a perfect cover for keeping these materials for itself.

Moreover, China’s plans to export EVs suggest designs on the car market far from the borders of the Middle Kingdom – and lead to a second example of China presenting a policy that seems to mean one thing but that contains concealed layers of meaning. If at some point China does allow some foreign car companies to keep 100 percent ownership of their Chinese operations, what would it really signify? After all, with the system of points and quotas, China will be maintaining a lot of control over its domestic car markets. Sure, foreign car companies, Tesla for instance, might be allowed full ownership of what they make, but what they make, and where they can sell (probably only to China citizens) will likely be controlled by Beijing, which will make sure that its companies are the ones benefiting from exports.

Tesla’s Elon Musk is brilliant and charismatic, but those characteristics won’t translate into worldwide EV hegemony if China controls all the materials Tesla’s cars need, which is why for the long run we continue to favor BYD and other Chinese automakers over Tesla. In our hearts we’re rooting for Musk, but at this point the ultra-hyped automaker is more akin to a lottery ticket than a rational investment, and as a rational investor you should insist on better odds.


You might also enjoy…


Forget Buy and Hold. Here’s how to retire faster…

I’m not a fan of “buy and hold.” Gurus like to tell you that patience is the key, but I call horse puckey.

We’ve discovered an investing technique that consistently pays out easy-to-repeat profits.

One that’s proven to beat the market 2,082% in head-to-head testing.

And one that’s generated over 488 winners since 2011.

This method is so powerful, in fact, some of the investors we’ve let use it reported back to us saying they’ve made $71,425… $82,371… and even as much as $151,000 in a single year thanks to this “trick.”

That’s how powerful this investing technique is!

What what exactly is this mysterious method? I’ve put all the details together here.

Stock Talk — Post a comment Comment Guidelines

Our Stock Talk section is reserved for productive dialogue pertaining to the content and portfolio recommendations of this service. We reserve the right to remove any comments we feel do not benefit other readers. If you have a general investment comment not related to this article, please post to our Stock Talk page. If you have a personal question about your subscription or need technical help, please contact our customer service team. And if you have any success stories to share with our analysts, they’re always happy to hear them. Note that we may use your kind words in our promotional materials. Thank you.

You must be logged in to post to Stock Talk OR create an account.

Create a new Investing Daily account

  • - OR -

* Investing Daily will use any information you provide in a manner consistent with our Privacy Policy. Your email address is used for account verification and will remain private.

Stock Talk

  1. avatar
    naveen IIT x citi Reply October 9, 2017 at 12:34 AM EDT

    Wonderful article ,well explained. I appreciate the Chinese policy logic in promoting local players for EV otherwise domestic jobs will be at the mercy of unreliable people like ELon Musk. This is the kind of mes happening in India now and all the time in all sectors and thanks due to our reliance on American clients for business. Top banks, Top tEch jobs all layoffs now. In 100os. I hope Soon these unpatriotic politicians and policy makers meet their end.