Stalking Exotic MLPs

The MLP space is dominated by oil and gas, and within the oil and gas sector the offerings tend to be concentrated around midstream assets like pipelines. As toll collectors, pipeline companies can offer fairly predictable distributions that are more insulated from commodity fluctuations.

But there are MLP offerings outside of the energy sector, and today I want to mention a few. These range from diversified offerings that hold some oil and gas companies, to owners of chemical plants and all the way to oddball businesses like cemeteries and amusement parks.

Icahn Enterprises LP (Nasdaq: IEP) is an MLP that is involved in nine primary business segments: Investment, Automotive, Energy, Gaming, Railcar, Food Packaging, Metals, Real Estate and Home Fashion. IEP invests in energy-related companies that we like such as CVR Refining (NYSE: CVRR) and American Railcar Industries (Nasdaq: ARII), but more than half of its assets is invested in the automotive sector and in investment funds.

IEP also owns one of the largest independent metal recycling companies in the US in PSC Metals and a stake in casino operator Tropicana Entertainment (OTC: TPCA). Since 2000, IEP has achieved an average annual return of 20.2 percent, and units currently yield 6.6 percent. However, it should be noted that Carl Icahn’s activist style may not appeal to typical MLP investors.

In the chemicals sector we have PetroLogistics LP (NYSE: PDH), which launched in 2012 and operates in an interesting niche. PDH owns and operates the world’s largest propane dehydrogenation facility for propylene production. Propylene is widely used in the petrochemical industry, and PDH is strategically located near the Houston Ship Channel and within 50 miles of the plants responsible for approximately half of US propylene consumption.

As natural gas supplies have increased in the US, so too have those of propane, a byproduct of natural gas production. This has depressed propane prices even as declining propylene output from oil refiners has strengthened propylene prices. PDH is well-positioned to benefit from this propane-propylene differential. PDH units have sold off in recent months partly on concerns that increasing propane exports will boost prices, and this has pushed the yield of PDH above 10 percent.

Among the more unusual MLP offerings would have to be StoneMor Partners LP (NYSE: STON). The partnership is the second-largest owner/operator of cemeteries in the United States and is the only publicly traded MLP operating in this space. STON also operates 92 funeral homes. The partnership completed its IPO in September 2004, with the goal of generating increasing distributable cash flow (DCF) for its unitholders through acquisitions, cemetery merchandise and services, and income from managed trusts.

Whereas pipeline MLPs have fairly predictable distributions because they are mostly fee-based businesses, STON asserts that its distributions are predictable thanks to predictable death rates and an aging population.

The partnership argues that the scarcity and high cost of real estate near densely populated areas presents a significant barrier to entry for competitors. Management has increased distributions by 30 percent since the IPO, and units presently yield 10.2 percent. But before rushing out to buy this one, note that there have been a number of articles questioning the sustainability of the distribution.  

The last unconventional MLP I want to look at today is Cedar Fair LP (NYSE: FUN). Cedar Fair is one of the largest regional amusement-resort operators in the world, with 11 amusement parks, four outdoor water parks, one indoor water park and five hotels. Its operations are located in 13 of the 25 largest metropolitan in the US, as well as in Toronto, Canada.

One warning flag on StoneMor is the low level of institutional ownership, at just 9.9 percent of the float. Institutions seem to have a lot more faith in Cedar Fair, holding 56.1 percent of units outstanding. Cedar Fair had a record first half this year, leading the CEO to suggest that 2013 will be the fourth consecutive year of record results. At the current price, the annualized yield is 5.7 percent.

For more on non-traditional MLPs, including an in-depth analysis of Icahn Enterprises, see the forthcoming September issue of MLP Profits, Next week we will continue our look at this niche with a review of MLPs in real estate, fertilizer production and the timber industry.  

(Follow Robert Rapier on Twitter, LinkedIn, or Facebook.)

 

Portfolio Update

An MLP Even Hedgeye Won’t Dis

There wasn’t much news in the MLP space last week aside from Hedgeye Research’s threat to expose Kinder Morgan (NYSE: KMI) as a “house of cards,” reviewed here.  (We’ll have to wait until tomorrow for the promised details on how this small boutique hopes to bring down the largest MLP that’s also one of the industry’s safest.)

More credibly, Oppenheimer has resumed coverage of MLPs with several Buy recommendations focused on the same themes we’ve been championing: a preference for general partners and focus on rapid distribution growth.

The latter led Oppenheimer to recommend MLP Profits Growth Portfolio holding EQT Midstream (NYSE: EQM) as one of its top picks in the space, with an Outperform rating and a $55 price target.

Oppenheimer praised EQM’s strong balance sheet, excellent growth prospects and a supportive sponsor in one of the leading Marcellus drillers EQT (NYSE: EQT), the same qualities that led us to recommend EQM last month.

Incidentally, when Hedgeye Research energy analyst Kevin Kaiser was recently asked if there are any MLPs he likes, he named EQM as “ok” “on a relative basis,” and despite “tough” valuation. For Kaiser, who believes MLPs are a bubble waiting to burst, that passes for high praise. But we think KMI with its 80,000 miles of long-term contracted, fee-based pipelines and $4.5 billion in annual affiliate distributions will also somehow survive Hedgeye’s scaremongering.  

— Igor Greenwald

Stock Talk

TC Investments

Andrew Trautmann

Linn is viewed as a “sell” but KMP has retained your endorsement . As I recall Linn was reinforced as a “buy” initially after Hedgey attacked and then after it lost 25% of its value on huge volume you suggested to “sell” Linn Energy.
Is this “deja vu” ? . I have a core position in KMI and KMP and don’t want to get this one wrong. If Kinder Morgan succumbs then the entire MLP model will lose investor sentiment . Obviously , Hedgey has a basic THESIS that MLP’s are “paper tiger” investment ! Thanks for following up in this important matter .

Igor Greenwald

Igor Greenwald

Thanks for your feedback. We exited Linn with a significant portfolio gain based on the SEC probe, not Hedgeye research. I’m sorry if the timing didn’t work well for you. You can still pick up Linn units at a significant discount to where we recommended selling them. I don’t think we can extrapolate anything from the Linn case to Kinder Morgan, but of course I’m not clairvoyant.

Add New Comments

You must be logged in to post to Stock Talk OR create an account