This Ship’s Not Going Down

Let’s dispense with small talk. Subscriber Steve Keller has a Stock Talk question that’s likely on many readers’ minds right now:

Igor,
I hold mostly “conservative” rated MLPs that you are still recommending as Buys, even as their prices are dropping by several percentage points each day. Most of these companies are reported by you to have little or no involvement in oil production and/or distribution, but are instead focused on natural gas (midstream services), and their revenues are supposedly tied to long-term contracts that should not be affected by the price of oil. Why do you think that these companies, companies that service natural gas production, processing and distribution, are being hit so hard? Also, I’ve read that the Saudis will stop their monkeying with the market when oil hits $45 per barrel. If this is the case, what will the effect of say, $45 oil be on the distributions of these companies, (such as EEP, EPD, and ETP)?

Steve,

All the MLPs in our Conservative Portfolio are in fact largely insulated from the effects of lower oil prices years into the future, if they’re affected at all. All of our (and theirs) assurances about the security of their cash flows still apply.

Their prices didn’t fall based on a detailed analysis of next year’s likely distributions. They fell because professional investment managers and retail unitholders either could no longer stomach the daily depreciation, wanted to lock in losses for tax reasons, didn’t want to hold anything associated with energy, or all of the above.

If you take a look at the charts of these MLPs from the first half of the year, you’ll see relentless appreciation and price-insensitive accumulation. And if you look at our issue archives from the same period you’ll find repeated warnings that this new hot money is likely to be tested in the eventual correction.

We’re in the middle of this test now, and if you think $40-per-barrel crude is coming and well be the new normal, that’s one answer. But, as I noted last month, an analysis of longer-term oil fundamentals doesn’t support it. From where I sit, the odds favor an eventual  recovery back to the $70 to $80 range more indicative of marginal production costs. And in that case every MLP we recommend will do fine and is not deserving of the recent discounting most have suffered.

That doesn’t mean the fair weather MLP fans will be back; with “shale boom fever” cured for the time being, it’s probably safer to assume they won’t be.

The good news is that this allows patient investors to lock in more favorable yield on tax deferred income, in an environment where a reasonable and reasonably secure yield is still hard to come by.

We can’t control how long the tax-loss selling or the selling at the behest of institutional risk managers lasts. But we’re in charge of our own response to the drop in prices.

Ours was to search high and low for opportunities created by the market dislocation. That’s led us to the gas driller EQT (NYSE: EQT), which is building a midstream business in the Marcellus largely with other people’s money, as elaborated in this month’s first New Buys feature.

We’ve also rounded up three picks in a tanker industry that’s benefiting hugely from lower oil and fuel prices. You’ll find more on the budding shipping recovery in Sector Spotlight.

The recent troubles of upstream MLPs are analyzed and explained in this In Focus feature.

After recommending two drilling partnerships earlier in the month, we make the case for them in the other New Buys feature here.

What’s happened to MLPs over the last month is nothing they haven’t seen before, and weathered well. Veteran investors in this sector know the drill: it almost never pays to sell when everyone else is itching to do so.

Portfolio Update will return next month along with a revised list of Best Buys for 2015 and a breakdown of our record over the past year. May the holidays bring you joy and relief from market worries in the meantime.

Portfolio Action Summary

  • EQT (NYSE: EQT) added to Aggressive Portfolio. Buy below $100
  • Scorpio Tankers (NYSE: STNG) added to Aggressive Portfolio. Buy below $9.50
  • Capital Products Partners (NASDAQ: CPLP) added to Aggressive Portfolio. Buy below $9
  • Teekay Tankers (NYSE: TNK) added to Aggressive Portfolio. Buy below $6
  • Memorial Production Partners (NASDAQ: MEMP) buy below target lowered to $15 in Aggressive Portfolio
  • Vanguard Natural Resources (NASDAQ: VNR) buy below target lowered to $16 in Aggressive Portfolio

 

Stock Talk

Richard Bryan

Richard Bryan

I agree that EPD is not going down. Despite the carnage of the last few weeks, it is still my largest holding and I am not selling.
However I do have a sizeable position in LINE. I have owned it so long that I still have a capital gain on the purchase price. I would like to hear your short take on their ability to weather this storm. Their debt/equity is about 60% which is higher than the mid-streamers but that doesn’t mean much to me. I don’t want to sell if there is a decent chance they will survive I can stand the volatility. Also I will have to pay cap gain recapture on virtually the entire gross sales price due to years of distributions.

Guest User

Guest User

Dear Igor,

As a new subscriber, I need definitions of “Upstream, Midstream and Lowstream”.

Thanks,
M. G. W.

Igor Greenwald

Igor Greenwald

Pardon my jargon, please. Upstream refers to exploration and production, and I suppose by extension the related oilfield services providers. Midstream is for the pipeline operators, gas gatherers and processors, logistics providers and so forth moving the energy stream beyond the wellhead and often providing some processing along the way, notably for gas. Downstream refers to crude refiners, fuel retailers, propane distributors, etc., the businesses turning crude into fuels and distributing various fuels to end users.

Bruce Honig

Bruce Honig

I disagree. Over the past few years, midstream MLPs have seen dramatic price appreciation due to growing income streams from new projects and acquisitions. They have become a growth story (not an income investment). The future growth is being threatened, so investors are adjusting their projections. With less future growth, the MLPs may not warrant the premium stock price.

Igor Greenwald

Igor Greenwald

Not sure which part you disagree with, Bruce, as I tried to convey, both here and in my Investing Insider annual predictions, that I in fact generally agree with you. I don’t think we’re going to the old highs soon. At the same time, I think it’s important not to get too gloomy on the midstream space amid this dramatic short-term price action in crude. Most MLPs are not making much money off crude, and even if oil production were to permanently slow (not a given, I think) you’d find the best midstream providers extending downstream to lock in their margin, as Enterprise is doing for example with its propylene plant. The bottom line is that US energy sources are competitive against global alternatives, and on that basis will ultimately harnessed, processed and sold at a price that makes that effort worthwhile. US LNG is much more sensible for China than choking on imported and domestic coal.

Kestrelwind

Kestrelwind

“When others are greedy, be fearful, but, when other’s are fearful, be greedy.” Buffett (how appropriate a name…)

Gains made over the past two trading sessions who believe and follow this advice have been exceptional. For those of us who have been investing in this space for almost 15 years, this is nothing new. There is a point where distribution rates reach a level relative to SP500 that make no sense, reached earlier this year. A couple of days ago we similarly reached a point where distribution levels made no sense and it was time to reconsider value vs. fear.

Igor Greenwald

Igor Greenwald

Appreciate the long-term perspective. I really enjoy hearing from people who knew to get into MLPs in 1999.

Allen Mcginnis

Allen Mcginnis

cvrr- can it still pay a dividend ? if so what will it be ?

Igor Greenwald

Igor Greenwald

CVRR is a variable distribution MLP, so while it can certainly pay a distribution that payout will vary depending on the partnership’s profits and its capital spending needs. While CVRR has been caught up in the energy crash, it owns two well-run refineries that in the past have provided a very attractive yield based on actual payouts, and I’d expect that trend to continue.

Igor Greenwald

Igor Greenwald

I wrote more on CVRR in today’s MLP Investing Insider:
http://www.investingdaily.com/mlp-profits/articles/21876/a-tempered-outlook-for-2015-2/

Igor Greenwald

Igor Greenwald

I want to let everyone know that the next issue if MLP Profits will be published on Tuesday, Jan. 20. We have another heavy slate of analysis, featuring a new Best Buys list and several other buy lists organized by theme, a tally of our 2014 performance, new buy recommendations, a sector spotlight on fracking sand suppliers and portfolio updates. I’d rather to take a couple of extra days to make sure all this is up to our standards and most useful to you in the weeks and months ahead.

Brian

Brian E. Fitzgerald

I read your advisement on CVRR just in time to catch a 20% drop in triple normal volume. Not a good introduction into a position and actually a typical strong sell signal. Are you hanging on?

Igor Greenwald

Igor Greenwald

I’m buying because I don’t think the drop is justified or sustainable

Add New Comments

You must be logged in to post to Stock Talk OR create an account