Will Rising Rates Lead to a Reckoning for High Yielders?

The real world often makes Swiss cheese out of theory. That could be the case for some income investors’ favorite high-yield stocks, which are having a difficult time in an unforgiving market.

In theory, the highest-yielding equities should be able to stave off competition from fixed-income securities once rates start to rise.

After all, it would take quite a run-up in rates for bonds to become more attractive than high-yield stocks, especially since rates will be rising gradually from a historic low.

But as we’ve seen with the so-called Taper Tantrum in 2013 and the correction in utilities this year, the market can be indiscriminate when it applies conventional wisdom to dividend stocks.

The conventional wisdom, of course, is that dividend stocks perform poorly in a rising-rate environment. However, history shows that isn’t the case, at least if you can afford to reinvest your dividends.

A landmark study published by Ned Davis Research found that dividend stocks outperformed non-dividend payers on a total-return basis in the three types of rising-rate environments it examined. Companies that grew their dividends–a major focus of Canadian Edge’s methodology–did even better.

And while investors who pushed dividend stocks to dizzying new heights without regard to fundamentals are now dumping them in the same manner, that won’t always be the case.

A rising-rate environment will pose new challenges for companies, and that will force investors to start differentiating between them on a fundamental basis again.

For instance, many high yielders have taken advantage of the low cost of capital since the downturn to grow their empires. They’ve also used retail investors’ seemingly insatiable demand for yield to make a number of secondary equity issuances, diluting the stake of existing shareholders.

With borrowing costs set to rise, some high-yield stocks will have to pivot from growth-via-acquisition to organic growth. But that transition won’t always be easy.

Case in point: Student Transportation Inc. (NSDQ: STB, TSX: STB)

With a yield that’s averaged 8.5% over the past five years, Student Transportation boasts some hardcore income-hungry devotees among its shareholders.

But since hitting a trailing five-year high in mid-February, its TSX-listed shares have fallen nearly 20%. The drop in its U.S. listing has been deeper and even more protracted, owing to the decline in the Canadian dollar.

In the latest issue of Canadian Edge, we reviewed the possible reasons behind the stock’s selloff. In the absence of any real news, we could only speculate on the cause.

However, this article also prompted a subscriber to inquire about the company’s plans for organic growth, particularly on the non-asset side.

With a fleet of roughly 12,000 vehicles, it can get pretty expensive running the third-largest school bus company in North America.

Until recently, Student Transportation had been pursuing a consolidation strategy in what is still a highly fragmented market. But that approach has yet to lead to the sort of efficiencies that translate into enduring growth.

Now the company hopes to find long-term growth by shifting more and more to a non-asset model.

That can involve a number of areas, including going from being an owner of the buses it operates to entering into managed contracts, where school districts own the buses and pay for fuel and other major expenses, while Student Transportation operates and manages the fleet. At present, however, just 5% of the company’s fleet operates under such contracts.

But over the past year, the company has gotten much more serious about offering these types of services, with the launch of its Transportation Sector Consultants division and the hiring of a chief growth officer to oversee the expansion of this business and other non-asset ventures.

In fact, the most forward-thinking of these initiatives is SafeStop, a mobile app that allows parents to track their kids’ commute home in real time.

The SafeStop app only just launched during the past school year, so its contribution to revenue does not appear to be all that meaningful at this point.

Indeed, it’s difficult to tell precisely how much revenue the app is expected to generate in full-year fiscal 2015, which ends June 30. The company’s segment reporting isn’t especially detailed, nor are there any references to the app in recent financials.

On its Feb. 12 earnings call, management reported that SafeStop was live on about 300 buses, with another 700 coming up.

At the same time, it also acknowledged that the total contribution to revenue from its non-asset business, which probably includes SafeStop, will be just $4 million to $5 million for this fiscal year.

So far, at least nine school districts in different states in the U.S. have signed up for SafeStop, or have it included as part of their contract, along with three individual schools and one university (for its student shuttle).

But the potential market for this app is huge, and has positive implications for the company’s transition from growth via acquisition to a more organic growth model.

STB currently serves about 1 million children in 375 school districts across North America.

And there are a total of 36 million parents in North America whose students ride the bus. So STB may have a significant opportunity beyond its existing customer base.

Indeed, some competitors as well as school districts that handle their own fleets have already inquired about licensing or white labeling the service.

Management is targeting 100,000 parent subscribers, as it moves from the soft-launch phase to a fully marketed roll-out.

In addition to substantial one-time fees, the app’s implementation has two different avenues for earning recurring revenue.

Payment for SafeStop is generally covered by both school districts and parents.

At the parent level, the full price is $5 per month for the nine months of the school year. Many school districts partially subsidize that fee as well.

At the school district level, the set-up fee appears to be around $20,000.

Then there are nearly $11,000 in recurring annual fees (above and beyond what the parents pay), including $4,000 annually for the system, $5,750 annually for software and hardware, and another $1,000 annually for an alert system. These fees are based on what one school district reported, so they may vary by the size of the district.

There are other apps that offer parents the ability to track the whereabouts of their children for a similar monthly fee, but that requires that their kids already have a cell phone.

And none of the competing apps have the level of detail that SafeStop offers, which utilizes onboard GPS to give arrival times down to the minute.

We remain cautious on Student Transportation’s prospects, but we’re certainly intrigued by its latest moves.

Dividend Champions: Portfolio Update

By Deon Vernooy

Inter Pipeline Ltd. (TSX: IPL, OTC: IPPLF) announced a $131 million acquisition of four petroleum and petrochemical storage facilities in Sweden. These facilities are located along the Baltic Sea and Danish Straits, a major petroleum trade route for marine transportation vessels.

The facilities contain 144 tanks and five underground caverns, with a combined storage capacity of 7.4 million barrels. The largest facility is located in Gothenburg, with a 5.7 million barrel capacity.

The terminals have generated about $20 million in EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxation, depreciation and amortization) over the past five years, which implies a reasonable acquisition multiple of 6.7 times.

The acquisition expands Inter Pipelines’ European storage capacity by 40%, to 27 million barrels. And it’s expected to be immediately accretive to the company’s earnings, adding $0.04 per share (around 2%) on an annual basis.

In another positive development, the company announced the completion of a $45 million capacity upgrade on the Polaris pipeline system. This is expected to add $19 million in EBITDA (equivalent to 2.5% of 2014 EBITDA) on an annual basis.

Inter Pipeline is one of the core holdings in our Dividend Champions Portfolio, and in the June issue of Canadian Edge, we increased its weighting to 4.6%. Inter Pipeline is a buy below $32.87.

Rogers Communications Inc. (TSX: RY, NYSE: RY), a member of our Dividend Champions Watch List, is one of Canada’s Big Three telecom providers.

The company has announced it’s acquiring the virtually bankrupt Mobilicity.

Mobilicity has 155,000 active subscribers and owns valuable wireless spectrum licenses in British Columbia, Ontario and Alberta. Rogers will be paying $440 million for the company and also gets access to a tax loss of about $175 million.

The transaction demonstrates once again the aggressive approach that Rogers has taken in pursuit of acquiring wireless assets under CEO Guy Laurence.

Rogers already carries a substantial debt load, has been losing wireless customers to competitors and has a poor client-service reputation.

Despite their somewhat more expensive valuations, we continue to prefer BCE Inc. (TSX: BCE, NYSE: BCE) and Telus Corp. (TSX: T, NYSE: TU), which are core holdings in our Dividend Champions Portfolio.

Stock Talk

Derrick Samuelson

Derrick Samuelson

As I understand it, STB going forward will pay dividends directly in US dollars, rather than converting from Canadian dollars. Is this a plus for US investors?

Ari Charney

Ari Charney

That’s correct. It’s a plus insofar as the company already earns the vast majority of its revenue in U.S. dollars, so that would presumably eliminate a minor expense in the form of hedging costs. But that’s about it, unless some investors were incurring costs at the brokerage level from having their dividends converted from Canadian dollars into U.S. dollars.

However, I did wonder if the announcement might have spooked some investors, since the stock was already in selloff mode when this change was announced, and at the time there wasn’t much other significant news about the company.

Best regards,
Ari

Jill Wood

Jill Wood

Do you have any advice on what will happen to the stock ARESF in near future with what’s going on in Canadian housing market?

Ari Charney

Ari Charney

Hi Jill,

I actually ended up writing a whole article on this for my Canadian Currents column in the forthcoming issue of Canadian Edge.

Without cannibalizing too much of what I wrote there, Artis’ portfolio consists of commercial real estate–office space, industrial and retail–not residential real estate. And the challenges facing each of these subsectors are different than those of the residential market.

From a macro standpoint, the biggest challenge for Artis is the fact that because it started out as a REIT based in Western Canada, a sizable portion of its portfolio–nearly 40% based on net operating income–is still concentrated in the resource-rich province of Alberta, which is bearing the brunt of the oil shock.

While vacancies have spiked at some properties in certain areas of the province, overall occupancy rates at Artis’ Alberta properties held steady at 95.5% as of the end of the first quarter.

And expiring leases are staggered so that there’s no one year in which Artis will face a massive reckoning from renewals amid a weak market.

Even so, given the widespread expectation that Alberta is on the verge of falling into a recession, further deterioration seems likely.

We’ll continue to monitor the situation. But for now, Artis’ portfolio is still holding up reasonably well.

Best regards,
Ari

Add New Comments

You must be logged in to post to Stock Talk OR create an account