Green Islands in Red Tide

The past year has been a tough one for MLPs and, contrary to our expectations back in January, it actually got tougher in 2015 as buyers held out for discounts.

They got plenty of those from determined sellers, many of whom, I suspect, joined the party unfashionably late in 2013 and the first half of 2014, only to see their hopes cruelly dashed.

The Alerian MLP Index was down 11% on a total return basis including its components’ distributions between Jan. 1 and June 30, despite the fact that U.S. oil output hit a 45-year high in May.

Sellers appeared not to care about that, just as they weren’t impressed with the fact that most MLPs don’t actually deal with crude and in fact have very low direct exposure to short-term swings in energy prices.

In fact, MLPs suffered a bigger hit than large-cap energy stocks; the benchmark Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund (NYSE: XLE) was down 3.8% on a total return basis in the first half.

Our portfolios fared significantly better. The 54 securities recommended by MLP Profits in the first half of 2015 averaged a total return of 0.9%, and the Best Buys list we published on Jan. 21 averaged a total return of 7.9% between that date and June 30.

150715MLPPmidyearbestbuys
We “cheated,” of course – in the sense that not all of our recommendations were actual MLPs, consistent with our long-standing advocacy of certain MLP corporate sponsors.

And in fact it was one of  the two corporate general partners of MLPs among our 10 Best Buys that led the way, Williams (WMB) returning 41% thanks to the (promptly rejected) buyout bid by Energy Transfer Equity (NYSE: ETE). Getting to that number required selling half of the position on the day of the bid announcement, as we advised, at what has so far proven to be the stock’s high point.

Despite the nice average gain, that Best Buys list was hit-or-miss, with four winners and six losers. But the misses were modest and the hits lucrative, with ETE’s 21% return the smallest of the four and CVR Refining (NYSE: CVRR) and Delek Logistics Partners (NYSE: DKL) both delivering gains in excess of 30%.   

The results were far less happy in a Conservative Portfolio down to a half-dozen recommendations following the buyout of Oiltanking Partners by Enterprise Products Partners (NYSE: EPD).

I’d hoped these midstream giants would weather the market turmoil well given their scale, diversification and financial conservatism. Instead, they became too big not to sell, exposed to persistent fund outflows.

We’re certainly not giving up on them here with market sentiment so out of tune with their long-term prospects.     

150715MLPPmidyearconservative
The Growth Portfolio was nearly four times as large and fared much better, returning 1.8% on average. In addition to Williams, Delek Logistics and Energy Transfer Equity, standouts included the refinery logistics MLP Holly Energy Partners (NYSE: HEP) and the midstream general partner SemGroup (NYSE: SEMG), both recommended in the middle of last year.

DCP Midstream Partners (NYSE: DPM) was by far the biggest loser amid low natural gas liquids prices and concerns about the credit ratings of its general partner. I expect these to prove overblown over time and am somewhat encouraged by the much stronger performance of DPM’s bonds during the second quarter.

150715MLPPmidyeargrowth
Ironically, the Aggressive Portfolio did best of all, more than doubling the return of our Growth basket. It benefited from the timely additions of three tanker fleet operators last December, which delivered the 32% return in Teekay Tankers (NYSE: TNK) as well as 19% from Scorpio Tankers (NYSE: STNG). Those gains are no less real for the fact that neither Teekay nor Scorpio calls itself an MLP. Western Refining (WNR) isn’t one either, but rather a shareholder-friendly refiner profiting from MLP affiliates.

We also benefited from the timely end of short-term speculations in a pair of upstream MLPs and from January’s recommendation of Cedar Fair (NYSE: FUN), an MLP leveraged to lower fuel prices as the operator of destination amusement parks.

150715MLPPmidyearaggressive
The main drags on the Aggressive Portfolio’s performance were the fracking sand producer Hi-Crush Partners (NYSE: HCLP) and coal general partner Alliance Holdings (NASDAQ: AHGP), both now purged, and Boardwalk Pipeline Partners (NYSE: BWP), which is so cheap again it should bounce back eventually.

The UBS ETRACS 2x Monthly Leveraged Long Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN (NYSE: MLPL) fared about as badly as you’d expect a leveraged sector bet to perform when its sector is down double-digits. I fully expect a turnaround in this one as well before too long.

An average return of 0.9% over six months is nothing to crow about, of course. But given the 11% loss for the most widely tracked MLP benchmark things obviously could have gone much worse. Getting big scores from four of our Best Buys was icing on the cake. I do hope and expect the frosting to be distributed more evenly when we tally results for the full year.  

 

Stock Talk

Steve Keller

Steve Keller

Igor,

In Issue #73, “Green Islands in the Red Tide”, you chart the recent performance of your portfolio picks. In your charting you do something that irks me. Your Best Buy picks are charted based on “returns from 1/21 to 6/30.” However, you decide to cherry pick Williams (WMB) on this chart, and show a 41% return, based not on the same standard as the other holdings but on having sold half of one’s position on 6/22. This is cheating, imho. If you want to grandstand about your wisdom to sell at some particular moment, fine, but don’t use this arbitrary date in the same chart as the other holdings. If WMB is still a “Best Buy”, then the chart should reflect the same parameters as the other holdings on that list. If it’s no longer a “Best Buy”, then take it off the list and put it in a different category.

Igor Greenwald

Igor Greenwald

Wasn’t trying to grandstand about anything, but rather to convey the actual performance of the Best Buys list based on our specific recommendations for its components, notably the advice to lighten up on WMB immediately in the wake of ETE’s offer. That’s consistent with our handling of the partial sell calls on TRGP and EQM last year, and honestly didn’t affect the overall Best Buys average by much. When this method makes our overall results look worse, as undoubtedly one day it will, we’ll still use it. You’re free to focus on any particular aspect of our performance and assess it based on the criteria that make the most sense to you, of course.

feverdoc

feverdoc

Why do you think NMM’s price is so low given its 16% return and apparently stable dividends through 2016?

Igor Greenwald

Igor Greenwald

It’s low because the yield currently overstates NMM’s real earnings, and will continue to do so until drybulk charter rates recover further. Right now, odds are pretty good that the containership purchases NMM is using to buy time for that recovery may not prove all that advantageous over the longer haul. But I do think the stock has some bounces left and will provide exit opportunities materially above the current price.

Add New Comments

You must be logged in to post to Stock Talk OR create an account