Risky Business of Banking

Canadian banks sailed through the 2008 to 2009 global financial crisis without major problems while enhancing their reputations for being conservative and well managed. Of course, that’s history now, and we have to consider the effects of two major risks Canadian banks currently face.

Before we get to those risks, here’s a brief summary of the situation: Current bank valuations in Canada are at the lower end of historical ranges, reflecting investor concerns about these risks. We are comfortable with our Dividend Champions holding in TD Bank for reasons discussed in a separate article. Royal Bank, on the other hand, may be a candidate to sell at the first sign of trouble in the housing market.

Commodity Producers

The prolonged slump in commodity prices since 2011 has put pressure on mining companies and oil-and-gas producers. The exposures of the main Canadian banks to these sectors vary. Although the absolute numbers are large, the proportion of these loans to overall bank lending is limited. The average exposure of the four main Canadian banks is 2.6%, with Bank of Nova Scotia an outlier at 4.9%.

Apart from the drawn loans, the banks also may have undrawn commitments from untapped lines of credit to the commodity producers. The Bank of Nova Scotia discloses $13.5 billion of undrawn commitments to oil producers, which, if used, will add another 3% to the total exposure.

Also, the banks have other loans, including home loans and credit cards, extended to the Prairie provinces (Alberta and Saskatchewan). When borrowers lose their jobs, these loans are at risk. Of all the major banks, Royal Bank has the most exposure to home loans in these provinces, 9%, and Bank of Montreal the least, 6%.

Recently, the various banks commented on the results of internal stress tests performed to establish the harm of prolonged low energy prices on profitability. Even with oil prices at $30 per barrel, the management teams consider the impact controllable.

Real Estate

The major Canadian banks all have considerable exposure to the country’s real estate market, either through residential mortgage lending, home equity loans or various forms of commercial lending, including development and project finance.

The Canadian real estate market overall is considered by many analysts, including those at the Bank of Canada, to be overvalued. Given the traditional deep links that banks have with real estate, there is nowhere for them to hide when that market goes into a tailspin.

The two largest banks, Royal and TD, have the largest portfolios of Canadian real estate-backed loans—no surprise here. What is surprising is that Royal also has the largest exposure when Canadian real estate loans are measured as a proportion of the total loan portfolio, currently at 63%.

On the other hand, Bank of Montreal has a much smaller real estate portfolio of $134 billion, representing 41% of the total loan portfolio. Should things go wrong, BMO will be less vulnerable.

A further point is the level of diversification of the Royal Bank of Canada. Although a considerable portion of the loan book is Canadian real estate, RBC derives the lowest proportion of total revenue from interest income, mainly as a result of the large contribution of the investment banking operation.

Controls

The banks use various measures to mitigate the risks of their real estate lending. First, loans can be insured by the government-backed CMHC or private entities, reducing the risk to the lenders. Royal has the lowest portion of its residential portfolio insured, while TD Bank has 57% of the residential portfolio insured.in focus exposure risky

A second risk-management technique is the loan-to-value ratio (LTV), which shows the value of the loans compared with the value of the property-lending book. The point: Property prices can drop a long way before the real estate backing the loans becomes a concern for the banks.

Although the banks seem to be managing their lending risks well, a substantial drop in home prices would lead to higher credit losses because more borrowers will default during a market downturn. The provisions for covering these losses are currently at low levels as a result of the real estate bull market.in focus exposure real estate

Comfort Zone


The Canadian banks have performed well over the past decade, with the core lending growing steadily and wealth management and investment banking activities providing some impetus.

Nevertheless, should the Canadian real estate market go through a deep and extended correction, banks will suffer. RBC will be more exposed and BMO somewhat less exposed than the other major banks. In the end, though, the ways banks mitigate real estate risk boil down to some combination of insured mortgages and relatively low loan-to-value ratios for the uninsured components.in focus safeguards for lending

Stock Talk

Frank

Frank Solcan

Hello Ari/Deon,

I can’t find the hike in TD’s dividend anywhere.

Thanks,

Frank

Guest One

Deon Vernooy

Frank, the last dividend announced by TD was on 3 December with an ex dividend date of 6 January. The dividend amounted to C$0.51 per share which was 8.5% higher than the same quarter of last year.

Deon

Frank

Frank Solcan

Precisely,Deon. The dividend was not raised with the recent earnings announcement.

Frank

Guest One

Deon Vernooy

Frank, the dividend was announced at the same time of the results announcement on 5 November. The dividend was C$0.65 with an ex dividend date of 11 December and a pay date of 15 January 2016. The information in the latest Canadian Edge publication is correct but apologies for the incorrect information provided above.

Here is a link to the announcement [http://www.bce.ca/news-and-media/releases/show/BCE-reports-third-quarter-2015-results-1?page=1&month=&year=]

Deon

Frank

Frank Solcan

Thank you.

F.

Jill Wood

Jill Wood

Newalta Corp is way down. Do you think its a safe investment for the long run?

Ari Charney

Ari Charney

Hi Jill,

As we look ahead toward at least another 12 months of low crude oil prices, it may finally be time to throw in the towel on Newalta. In the new year, the editors will be reviewing the legacy portfolio holdings to decide which ones to hold and which ones to fold.

Unless there’s a major supply disruption in the Middle East, it looks like OPEC’s price war could bring more pain to energy producers, who are Newalta’s main customers, and that could lead to one more leg down in the energy sector.

At this point, Newalta’s share price has fallen low enough that you might be inclined to stick with it through the next phase of the energy sector’s bust, regardless of whether we decide to sell it.

If so, the good news is that the company has been taking steps to prepare itself for hard times.

For one, the company has cut long-term debt this year by 31.5%, to CAD311.5 million, and it doesn’t face any maturities until mid-2018, when its credit revolver comes due. It also cut its dividend, which is anathema to income investors, but often a crucial step for companies in financial straits.

Thanks to cost-cutting, pared CapEx, and savings from the dividend, analysts are forecasting EBITDA to jump to CAD78.1 million this year from a projected CAD51.3 million this year. Also of note, they’re expecting the company to be free-cash flow positive for the first time since 2010, to the tune of CAD25 million.

Newalta also has about $115 million in short-term liquidity available on its credit revolver. Importantly, its lenders granted it a waiver on complying with the revolver’s debt covenants through June 2017.

However, one concern is that even if Newalta comes through with stronger EBITDA growth next year, it may not be quite enough to be in compliance with its debt covenants by the June 2017 deadline. At year-end 2016, for instance, its leverage ratio would be 4.0x based on EBITDA projections, whereas its covenants require a leverage ratio of 3.5x.

If Newalta generates positive free cash flow next year and uses it to pay down debt, that would get it most of the way toward compliance. Then it would depend on whether the stronger projected run rate for EBITDA during the second half of 2016 (roughly CAD24 million per quarter) extends into the first half of 2017. If so, the company will be in the clear as far as compliance goes.

If not, however, then we would expect management to further cut or even suspend the dividend, which would bring the leverage ratio comfortably below 3.5x.

Despite these serious challenges, all of these things suggest the company could survive a deeper rout, though that doesn’t mean the share price won’t head even lower, especially if the dividend is cut once more or even suspended.

If you’re inclined to sell, and aren’t looking to take a loss before year-end for tax purposes, then you may be able get a better price early next year when the market enters its seasonally strong period. Additionally, volatility can give crude prices upside and downside, so any news-driven spikes might also give you an opportunity to sell at a better price than the one today.

Best regards,
Ari

Jill Wood

Jill Wood

Thank you for your information Ari. Can you also comment on the financial health our projected outlook for ARTIS and BREUF?

Thanks, Jill

Ari Charney

Ari Charney

Hi Jill,

I’ve been traveling this week, and that means I’m away from my trusty Bloomberg (as well as the fact that on a family vacation, my time is not exactly my own). I’ll be back in the office next week and will post a detailed reply then.

Best regards,
Ari

Ari Charney

Ari Charney

Hi Jill,

At year-end, Brookfield Real Estate was trading within shouting distance of its five-year high in Canadian dollar terms. But the global market meltdown over the past two weeks has pushed the stock down by about 4.6% in local currency terms, while the continued decline in the exchange rate has lopped off another 4.5 percentage points in U.S. dollar terms.

As one of the leading real estate brokers in Canada–it has a 20% share of the country’s market–Brookfield Real Estate has had a nice run owing to the country’s housing bubble. Although Canada’s policymakers have been proactive about trying to let some air out of the bubble, residential sales activity remains near a six-year high, while prices also remain near their highs for this cycle.

There are two concerns for Canada’s housing market, which like other countries is really a collection of regional housing markets.

1) The risk that the energy sector’s downturn, which principally affects Alberta, will spread to adjacent provinces that have economic exposure to Alberta.

2) Buying activity and prices in premium markets such as Vancouver have been pushed up by wealthy overseas investors, principally from Asia. With deflation fears emanating from China, that might force some of these owners to get liquid, though others see a possibility that China’s woes could actually encourage more real estate investment in Canada.

At the same time, the country’s central bank remains in easing mode, and rates are expected to be cut by at least another quarter-point this year. Although that might further inflate the bubble, low rates help consumers manage their debt burdens.

As for Brookfield, its payout ratio, which is expressed as a percentage of cash flow from operations, is typically between 60% and 70%, and it usally retains about 30% to 50% of the cash it generates to finance the purchase of new franchise agreements. The company’s debt is comprised of three credit facilities totaling C$78 million and maturing in February 2020.

Artis REIT rallied into year-end, but has sold off hard over the past two weeks. Its dropped 10.9% in Canadian dollar terms versus 7.2% for the S&P/TSX Composite Index and 4.6% for the Bloomberg Canadian REIT Index.

And over the past year, it’s fallen nearly 7 percentage points more than the Bloomberg Canadian REIT Index. This divergence in performance is likely due to Artis’ exposure to Alberta, which has been hit hard by the collapse in crude oil prices.

The REIT derives about 35.5% of net operating income from the province. In Calgary, for instance, Artis recently had an occupancy ratio of 86% for its office properties, but a new tenant at a key property will push that ratio back to 92% this year.

However, it’s otherwise reasonably well diversified geographically, including a 12.3% exposure to the U.S., which is helping offset the decline in Alberta.

Office properties account for about half of its portfolio on an NOI basis, with retail and industrial roughly splitting the balance.

The REIT has about C$2.8 billion in total debt outstanding, but no debt comes due until mid-2018.

Its payout ratio based on adjusted funds from operations was 83.5% for the first nine months of 2015.

Analysts forecast growth in FFO per share to flatten to 2% annually through 2017.

Best regards,
Ari

Add New Comments

You must be logged in to post to Stock Talk OR create an account